RFC 6085 PROPOSED STANDARD IPV6 · ETHERNET · MULTICAST

Address Mapping of IPv6 Multicast Packets on Ethernet

Clarifies that an IPv6 multicast packet may be sent in an Ethernet unicast frame when only one receiver matters.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
January 2011
AUTHORS
S. Gundavelli, M. Townsley, O. Troan, W. Dec
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 2464 — IPv6 over Ethernet
RECEIVER RULE
MUST NOT drop the packet
DOI
10.17487/RFC6085

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                     S. Gundavelli
Request for Comments: 6085                                   M. Townsley
Updates: 2464                                                   O. Troan
Category: Standards Track                                         W. Dec
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                    Cisco
                                                            January 2011


         Address Mapping of IPv6 Multicast Packets on Ethernet

Abstract

   When transmitting an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
   address, the IPv6 destination address is mapped to an Ethernet link-
   layer multicast address.  This document clarifies that a mapping of
   an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address may in some
   circumstances map to an Ethernet link-layer unicast address.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6085.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

1.  Introduction

   "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks" ([RFC2464],
   Section 7) specifies how an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
   address is mapped into an Ethernet link-layer address.  This document
   extends this mapping to explicitly allow for a mapping of an IPv6
   packet with a multicast destination address into an Ethernet link-
   layer unicast address, when it is clear that only one address is
   relevant.

   This mapping does not replace the mapping described in [RFC2464],
   Section 7.  The determination of the unicast Ethernet link-layer
   address and the construction of the outgoing IPv6 packet are out of
   scope for this document.

2.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

3.  Receiving IPv6 Multicast Packets

   An IPv6 node receiving an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
   address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address MUST NOT drop the
   packet as a result of the use of this form of address mapping.

4.  Security Considerations

   This document does not introduce any new security vulnerabilities.

5.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to acknowledge Bernard Aboba, Fred Baker, Wes
   Beebee, Ron Bonica, Olaf Bonness, Jean-Michel Combes, Ralph Droms,
   Alain Durand, Suresh Krishnan, Eric Levy-Abegnoli, Phil Roberts,
   Behcet Sarikaya, Hemant Singh, Mark Smith, Dave Thaler, Pascal
   Thubert, Stig Venaas, and Eric Voit for their contributions and
   discussions on this topic.

6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
               Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2464]   Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet
               Networks", RFC 2464, December 1998.

Authors' Addresses

   Sri Gundavelli
   Cisco
   170 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95134
   USA

   EMail: sgundave@cisco.com


   Mark Townsley
   Cisco
   L'Atlantis, 11, Rue Camille Desmoulins
   ISSY LES MOULINEAUX, ILE DE FRANCE  92782
   France

   EMail: townsley@cisco.com


   Ole Troan
   Cisco
   Oslo,
   Norway

   EMail: ot@cisco.com


   Wojciech Dec
   Cisco
   Haarlerbergweg 13-19
   Amsterdam, Noord-Holland  1101 CH
   Netherlands

   EMail: wdec@cisco.com

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMRFC 2464 maps an IPv6 multicast destination address to an Ethernet multicast address, leaving unclear whether a unicast Ethernet address is allowed.
MECHANISMThis document explicitly allows mapping an IPv6 multicast packet to an Ethernet unicast address when it is clear that only one address is relevant, and requires receivers not to drop such packets.
WHY IT MATTERSIt extends the RFC 2464 mapping without replacing it, and updates RFC 2464.

§1Introduction

Section 7 of RFC 2464 says how an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address is mapped to an Ethernet link-layer address. This document extends that mapping to explicitly allow an Ethernet unicast address, when it is clear that only one address is relevant.

The new mapping does not replace the RFC 2464 one. How the unicast Ethernet address is determined, and how the outgoing IPv6 packet is built, are out of scope.

Group messages normally go to the group's mailbox. Now they may go to one person's mailbox if only that person needs them.

§2Receiving Such Packets

The one rule is for receivers: an IPv6 node that receives a packet with a multicast destination address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address MUST NOT drop the packet because of this form of address mapping.

If a group message arrives addressed to you alone, do not throw it away just for that.

§3Security Considerations

The document states that it does not introduce any new security vulnerabilities. It offers no further analysis.

Nothing new that could go wrong was found.

§4References