HMAC-SHA-2 for SNMPv3: HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3
Stronger hash-based authentication for network management messages using SHA-2 instead of older hashes.
Merkle, J., Ed. and M. Lochter, "HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3", RFC 7630, DOI 10.17487/RFC7630, October 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7630>.
@misc{rfc7630,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 7630,
howpublished = {RFC 7630},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7630},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7630},
author = {J. Merkle and M. Lochter},
title = {{HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3}},
pagetotal = 14,
year = 2015,
month = oct,
} RFC text
Contents
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Merkle, Ed.
Request for Comments: 7630 Secunet Security Networks
Category: Standards Track M. Lochter
ISSN: 2070-1721 BSI
October 2015
HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols
in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3
Abstract
This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the
User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7630.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. The HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4.1. Deviations from the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol . 4
4.2. Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2.1. Processing an Outgoing Message . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2.2. Processing an Incoming Message . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Key Localization and Key Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Structure of the MIB Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Relationship to Other MIB Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Relationship to SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Relationship to SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.3. MIB Modules Required for IMPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.1. Use of the HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM . . 9
9.2. Cryptographic Strength of the Authentication Protocols . 9
9.3. Derivation of Keys from Passwords . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.4. Access to the SNMP-USM-HMAC-SHA2-MIB . . . . . . . . . . 11
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols. In particular, it defines
additional authentication protocols for the User-based Security Model
(USM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol version 3 (SNMPv3)
specified in RFC 3414 [RFC3414].
In RFC 3414, two different authentication protocols, HMAC-MD5-96 and
HMAC-SHA-96, are defined based on the hash functions MD5 and SHA-1,
respectively. This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication
protocols for USM using a Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC)
based on the SHA-2 family of hash functions [SHA] and truncated to
128 bits for SHA-224, to 192 bits for SHA-256, to 256 bits for
SHA-384, and to 384 bits for SHA-512. These protocols are
straightforward adaptations of the authentication protocols HMAC-
MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 to the SHA-2-based HMAC.
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
3. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
[RFC2119].
4. The HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols
This section describes the HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols, which
use the SHA-2 hash functions (described in FIPS PUB 180-4 [SHA] and
RFC 6234 [RFC6234]) in the HMAC mode (described in RFC 2104 [RFC2104]
and RFC 6234), truncating the output to 128 bits for SHA-224, 192
bits for SHA-256, 256 bits for SHA-384, and 384 bits for SHA-512.
RFC 6234 also provides source code for all the SHA-2 algorithms and
HMAC (without truncation). It also includes test harness and
standard test vectors for all the defined hash functions and HMAC
examples.
The following protocols are defined:
usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol: uses SHA-224 and truncates the
output to 128 bits (16 octets);
usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol: uses SHA-256 and truncates the
output to 192 bits (24 octets);
usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol: uses SHA-384 and truncates the
output to 256 bits (32 octets);
usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol: uses SHA-512 and truncates the
output to 384 bits (48 octets).
Implementations conforming to this specification MUST support
usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol and SHOULD support
usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol. The protocols
usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol and usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol are
OPTIONAL.
4.1. Deviations from the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol
All the HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols are straightforward
adaptations of the HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 authentication
protocols. Specifically, they differ from the HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-
SHA-96 authentication protocols in the following aspects:
o The SHA-2 hash function is used to compute the message digest in
the HMAC computation according to RFC 2104 and RFC 6234, as
opposed to the MD5 hash function [RFC1321] and SHA-1 hash function
[SHA] used in HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96, respectively.
Consequently, the length of the message digest prior to truncation
is 224 bits for the SHA-224-based protocol, 256 bits for the
SHA-256-based protocol, 384 bits for the SHA-384-based protocol,
and 512 bits for the SHA-512-based protocol.
o The resulting message digest (output of HMAC) is truncated to
* 16 octets for usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol
* 24 octets for usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol
* 32 octets for usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol
* 48 octets for usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol
as opposed to the truncation to 12 octets in HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-
SHA-96.
o The user's secret key to be used when calculating a digest MUST be
* 28 octets long and derived with SHA-224 for the SHA-224-based
protocol usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol
* 32 octets long and derived with SHA-256 for the SHA-256-based
protocol usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol
* 48 octets long and derived with SHA-384 for the SHA-384-based
protocol usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol
* 64 octets long and derived with SHA-512 for the SHA-512-based
protocol usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol
as opposed to the keys being 16 and 20 octets long in HMAC-MD5-96
and HMAC-SHA-96, respectively.
4.2. Processing
This section describes the procedures for the HMAC-SHA-2
authentication protocols. The descriptions are based on the
definition of services and data elements defined for HMAC-SHA-96 in
RFC 3414 with the deviations listed in Section 4.1.
Values of constants M (the length of the secret key in octets) and N
(the length of the Message Authentication Code (MAC) output in
octets), and the hash function H used below are:
usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol: M=28, N=16, H=SHA-224;
usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol: M=32, N=24, H=SHA-256;
usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol: M=48, N=32, H=SHA-384;
usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol: M=64, N=48, H=SHA-512.
4.2.1. Processing an Outgoing Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an outgoing message using one of the
authentication protocols defined above. Values of the constants M
and N, and the hash function H are as defined in Section 4.2 and are
selected based on which authentication protocol is configured for the
given USM usmUser Table entry.
1. The msgAuthenticationParameters field is set to the serialization
of an OCTET STRING containing N zero octets; it is serialized
according to the rules in RFC 3417 [RFC3417].
2. Using the secret authKey of M octets, the HMAC is calculated over
the wholeMsg according to RFC 6234 with hash function H.
3. The N first octets of the above HMAC are taken as the computed
MAC value.
4. The msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced with the MAC
obtained in the previous step.
5. The authenticatedWholeMsg is then returned to the caller together
with the statusInformation indicating success.
4.2.2. Processing an Incoming Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an incoming message using one of the
HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols. Values of the constants M and
N, and the hash function H are as defined in Section 4.2 and are
selected based on which authentication protocol is configured for the
given USM usmUser Table entry.
1. If the digest received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field
is not N octets long, then a failure and an errorIndication
(authenticationError) are returned to the calling module.
2. The MAC received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is
saved.
3. The digest in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced
by the N zero octets.
4. Using the secret authKey of M octets, the HMAC is calculated over
the wholeMsg according to RFC 6234 with hash function H.
5. The N first octets of the above HMAC are taken as the computed
MAC value.
6. The msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced with the MAC
value that was saved in step 2.
7. The newly calculated MAC is compared with the MAC saved in step
2. If they do not match, then a failure and an errorIndication
(authenticationFailure) are returned to the calling module.
8. The authenticatedWholeMsg and statusInformation indicating
success are then returned to the caller.
5. Key Localization and Key Change
For any of the protocols defined in Section 4, key localization and
key change SHALL be performed according to RFC 3414 [RFC3414] using
the same SHA-2 hash function as in the HMAC-SHA-2 authentication
protocol.
6. Structure of the MIB Module
The MIB module specified in this memo does not define any managed
objects, subtrees, notifications, or tables; rather, it only defines
object identities (for authentication protocols) under a subtree of
an existing MIB.
7. Relationship to Other MIB Modules
7.1. Relationship to SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB
RFC 3414 specifies the MIB module for USM for SNMPv3 (SNMP-USER-
BASED-SM-MIB), which defines authentication protocols for USM based
on the hash functions MD5 and SHA-1, respectively. The following MIB
module defines new HMAC-SHA2 authentication protocols for USM based
on the SHA-2 hash functions [SHA]. The use of the HMAC-SHA2
authentication protocols requires the usage of the objects defined in
the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB.
7.2. Relationship to SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB
RFC 3411 [RFC3411] specifies the SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB, which defines a
subtree snmpAuthProtocols for SNMP authentication protocols. The
following MIB module defines new authentication protocols in the
snmpAuthProtocols subtree.
7.3. MIB Modules Required for IMPORTS
The following MIB module IMPORTS definitions from SNMPv2-SMI
[RFC2578] and SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB [RFC3411].
8. Definitions
SNMP-USM-HMAC-SHA2-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-IDENTITY,
snmpModules FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- [RFC2578]
snmpAuthProtocols FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB; -- [RFC3411]
snmpUsmHmacSha2MIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "201508130000Z" -- 13 August 2015, midnight
ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO "WG email: OPSAWG@ietf.org
Subscribe:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Editor: Johannes Merkle
secunet Security Networks
Postal: Mergenthaler Allee 77
D-65760 Eschborn
Germany
Phone: +49 20154543091
Email: johannes.merkle@secunet.com
Co-Editor: Manfred Lochter
Bundesamt fuer Sicherheit in der
Informationstechnik (BSI)
Postal: Postfach 200363
D-53133 Bonn
Germany
Phone: +49 228 9582 5643
Email: manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de"
DESCRIPTION "Definitions of Object Identities needed
for the use of HMAC-SHA2 by SNMP's User-based
Security Model.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified
BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)."
REVISION "201508130000Z" -- 13 August 2015, midnight
DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC 7630"
::= { snmpModules 235 }
usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The Authentication Protocol
usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol uses HMAC-SHA-224 and
truncates output to 128 bits."
REFERENCE "- Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC 2104.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, 2012."
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 4 }
usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The Authentication Protocol
usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol uses HMAC-SHA-256 and
truncates output to 192 bits."
REFERENCE "- Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC 2104.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, 2012."
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 5 }
usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The Authentication Protocol
usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol uses HMAC-SHA-384 and
truncates output to 256 bits."
REFERENCE "- Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC 2104.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, 2012."
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 6 }
usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The Authentication Protocol
usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol uses HMAC-SHA-512 and
truncates output to 384 bits."
REFERENCE "- Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC 2104.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, 2012."
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 7 }
END
9. Security Considerations
9.1. Use of the HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM
The security considerations of RFC 3414 [RFC3414] also apply to the
HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols defined in this document.
9.2. Cryptographic Strength of the Authentication Protocols
At the time of publication of this document, all of the HMAC-SHA-2
authentication protocols provide a very high level of security. The
security of each HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocol depends on the
parameters used in the corresponding HMAC computation, which are the
length of the key (if the key has maximum entropy), the size of the
hash function's internal state, and the length of the truncated MAC.
For the HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols, these values are as
follows (values are given in bits).
+------------------------------+---------+----------------+---------+
| Protocol | Key | Size of | MAC |
| | length | internal state | length |
+------------------------------+---------+----------------+---------+
| usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol | 224 | 256 | 128 |
| usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol | 256 | 256 | 192 |
| usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol | 384 | 512 | 256 |
| usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol | 512 | 512 | 384 |
+------------------------------+---------+----------------+---------+
Table 1: HMAC Parameters of the HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols
The security of the HMAC scales with both the key length and the size
of the internal state: longer keys render key guessing attacks more
difficult, and a larger internal state decreases the success
probability of MAC forgeries based on internal collisions of the hash
function.
The role of the truncated output length is more complicated:
according to [BCK], there is a trade-off in that
by outputting less bits the attacker has less bits to predict in a
MAC forgery but, on the other hand, the attacker also learns less
about the output of the compression function from seeing the
authentication tags computed by legitimate parties.
Thus, truncation weakens the HMAC against forgery by guessing but, at
the same time, strengthens it against chosen message attacks aiming
at MAC forgery based on internal collisions or at key guessing. RFC
2104 and [BCK] allow truncation to any length that is not less than
half the size of the internal state.
Further discussion of the security of the HMAC construction is given
in RFC 2104.
9.3. Derivation of Keys from Passwords
If secret keys to be used for HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols are
derived from passwords, the derivation SHOULD be performed using the
password-to-key algorithm from Appendix A.1 of RFC 3414 with MD5
being replaced by the SHA-2 hash function H used in the HMAC-SHA-2
authentication protocol. Specifically, the password is converted
into the required secret key by the following steps:
o forming a string of length 1,048,576 octets by repeating the value
of the password as often as necessary, truncating accordingly, and
using the resulting string as the input to the hash function H.
The resulting digest, termed "digest1", is used in the next step.
o forming a second string by concatenating digest1, the SNMP
engine's snmpEngineID value, and digest1. This string is used as
input to the hash function H.
9.4. Access to the SNMP-USM-HMAC-SHA2-MIB
The SNMP-USM-HMAC-SHA2-MIB module defines OBJECT IDENTIFIER values
for use in other MIB modules. It does not define any objects that
can be accessed. As such, the SNMP-USM-HMAC-SHA2-MIB does not, by
itself, have any effect on the security of the Internet.
The values defined in this module are expected to be used with the
usmUserTable defined in the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB [RFC3414]. The
considerations in Section 11.5 of RFC 3414 should be taken into
account.
10. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned an OID for the MIB as follows.
+--------------------+-------------------------+
| Descriptor | OBJECT IDENTIFIER value |
+--------------------+-------------------------+
| snmpUsmHmacSha2MIB | { snmpModules 235 } |
+--------------------+-------------------------+
Table 2: OID of MIB
Furthermore, IANA has assigned a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols
registry for each of the following protocols.
+------------------------------+-------+-----------+
| Description | Value | Reference |
+------------------------------+-------+-----------+
| usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol | 4 | RFC 7630 |
| usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol | 5 | RFC 7630 |
| usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol | 6 | RFC 7630 |
| usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol | 7 | RFC 7630 |
+------------------------------+-------+-----------+
Table 3: Code Points Assigned to HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2104, February 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2104>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2578, April 1999,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2578>.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2579, DOI 10.17487/RFC2579, April 1999,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2579>.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2580, DOI 10.17487/RFC2580, April 1999,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2580>.
[RFC3414] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
(USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3414, December 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3414>.
[RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.
[SHA] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Secure
Hash Standard (SHS)", FIPS PUB 180-4,
DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4, March 2012,
<http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/
NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf>.
11.2. Informative References
[RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
DOI 10.17487/RFC1321, April 1992,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1321>.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3410, December 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3410>.
[RFC3411] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3411, December 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3411>.
[RFC3417] Presuhn, R., Ed., "Transport Mappings for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3417, December 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3417>.
[BCK] Bellare, M., Canetti, R., and H. Krawczyk, "Keyed Hash
Functions for Message Authentication", Advances in
Cryptology - CRYPTO 96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1109, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,
DOI 10.1007/3-540-68697-5_1, 1996.
Authors' Addresses
Johannes Merkle (editor)
Secunet Security Networks
Mergenthaler Allee 77
65760 Eschborn
Germany
Phone: +49 201 5454 3091
Email: johannes.merkle@secunet.com
Manfred Lochter
BSI
Postfach 200363
53133 Bonn
Germany
Phone: +49 228 9582 5643
Email: manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de
AI ELI5
On this page
§1Stronger Authentication for Network Management
RFC 7630 extends SNMPv3's User-based Security Model (USM) defined in RFC 3414 with four new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols. The original SNMPv3 authentication used HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96, both based on weaker or older hash functions.
These new protocols add support for the SHA-2 family of hash functions (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512), each truncated to an appropriate output size for use in the SNMP protocol. This allows network administrators to apply stronger cryptographic authentication to their management traffic.
SNMP is a way to manage network equipment. SNMPv3 lets you prove your identity with a secret code. This document adds newer, stronger secret codes based on modern cryptography.
§2The Four SHA-2 Authentication Protocols
RFC 7630 defines four protocols, each using a different SHA-2 hash function and truncation length. The usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol uses SHA-256 and truncates the output to 192 bits (24 octets), and implementations MUST support this protocol. The usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol uses SHA-512 truncated to 384 bits (48 octets) and SHOULD be supported.
Two additional optional protocols are defined: usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol (SHA-224 truncated to 128 bits or 16 octets) and usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol (SHA-384 truncated to 256 bits or 32 octets). Each protocol derives its secret key using the same hash function.
There are four versions, each using a different strength of SHA-2 encryption. The medium-strength versions (SHA-256 and SHA-512) are the important ones; others are optional.
- SHA-224usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol — 16 octets output, 28 octets key
- SHA-256usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol — 24 octets output, 32 octets key
- SHA-384usmHMAC256SHA384AuthProtocol — 32 octets output, 48 octets key
- SHA-512usmHMAC384SHA512AuthProtocol — 48 octets output, 64 octets key
§3Key Differences from Older Protocols
These protocols differ from the older HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 in three main ways. First, they use SHA-2 hash functions instead of MD5 or SHA-1. Second, the message digest output is longer before truncation: 224, 256, 384, or 512 bits depending on the protocol, versus the 160-bit SHA-1 or 128-bit MD5 previously used. Third, the truncation is deeper: between 128 and 384 bits in the output, whereas the older protocols truncated to just 96 bits.
As a result, the secret key used for each protocol must also be longer: 28 octets for SHA-224, 32 for SHA-256, 48 for SHA-384, and 64 for SHA-512, compared to 16 or 20 octets in the older protocols. The key length is derived from a password using the same SHA-2 hash function selected for the protocol.
The new protocols use stronger building blocks and longer secret codes than the old ones. This makes them harder to break.
§4How Authentication Works
When an SNMP engine sends an authenticated message, it computes an HMAC using the secret key and the appropriate SHA-2 function, then truncates the output and includes those bytes in the msgAuthenticationParameters field. When a message arrives, the engine checks that the received authentication code matches the code computed over the message.
The process follows the same steps as HMAC-SHA-96 from RFC 3414, with the hash function and truncation lengths adjusted. The SNMP message is treated as a whole, and the computed MAC is placed in the message before transmission. A receiver recalculates the MAC and compares it to the one received to verify authenticity.
The sender stamps the message with a secret code computed using SHA-2. The receiver checks the stamp using the same secret, and if they match, the message is real.
§5Cryptographic Strength and Key Derivation
At the time of publication, all four HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols provided a very high level of security. The strength depends on the key length (if the key has maximum entropy), the hash function's internal state size, and the truncated MAC length. For example, usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol uses a 256-bit key with a 256-bit internal state and a 192-bit truncated output.
If secret keys are derived from passwords, the derivation SHOULD use the password-to-key algorithm from RFC 3414 Appendix A.1, replacing MD5 with the appropriate SHA-2 function. The password is hashed into a 1,048,576-octet string, then combined with the SNMP engine ID. This process ensures that keys derived from short passwords are still long enough to provide security.
Longer secret codes and stronger math inside make these protocols very hard to break. If you use a password, it gets stretched to make sure the secret code is strong.