RFC 521 UNKNOWN SECURITY · NETWORK OPERATIONS

Restricted use of IMP DDT

A security measure restricting access to the debugging tool on network routing machines.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
May 1973
AUTHORS
A.M. McKenzie
STREAM
Legacy
WHAT IS PROTECTED
Commands that can alter the running IMP program
ACCESS METHOD
Sense switch 4 at site or software override from approved computers
MONITORING
Network Control Center monitors flag status
DOI
10.17487/RFC0521

RFC text

Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                        A. McKenzie
RFC #521                                                     BBN-NET
NIC #16855                                                   30 May 1973


                       Restricted Use of IMP DDT


    At the recent workshop on "Automated Resource Sharing on the
ARPANET", considerable interest was expressed on the topic of network
security.  In particular, representatives of several sites felt that
uncontrolled use of IMP DDT made access control mechanisms quite
vulnerable to interception or tampering.* Individuals at the workshop
seemed to be in general agreement that use of DDT should be much more
controlled than at present.  In addition, as the network continues to
take on a more and more operational character, and NCC use of DDT (which
must be coordinated with other DDT usage) increases** we begin to see
other reasons for controlling access to the DDT mechanism.

    Currently, and for the foreseeable future, it is important that the
NCC be able to use DDT at any IMP at any time.  It is also sometimes
necessary for site personnel to be able to operate a stand alone DDT
after an IMP crash.  Sometimes the NCC needs to ask site personnel to
operate the IMP DDT for the NCC if the network is partitioned.  We have
protected all DDT commands that can affect the running IMP program by
requiring that sense switch 4 be turned on at the site, or a software
override flag be enabled.  Only the BBN IMP Teletype, the BBN TIP
Teletype, and the PDP-1 can enable override.  The NCC monitors these
flags and reports any change in status.

    In line with this approach, we will soon modify the IMP system so
that any access to IMP DDT will require the same enabling actions (sense
switch four turned on or override enabled from BBN) now required for
core modification.  This will still allow the NCC the same ability to
operate DDT which it now has, and will permit site personnel to operate
DDT at the request of the NCC.  As is currently true, the NCC will


----------------
*Examples are easy to construct, but are intentionally omitted from this
document.

**DDT is currently used by the NCC operators for core verification, for
interface debugging, for loading TIP and VDH code, etc.  There is
discussion of using DDT in conjunction with an "auto-dialer" to examine
a TIP's "view" of a modem port at the same time that the auto-dialer is
examining the outside world's "view" of the port, of running "automatic"
core verification, of loading Satellite IMP code, etc.

monitor the setting of sense switch four and take appropriate action if
unauthorized use is observed.  We feel that this change will be
sufficient to discourage "hackers", although it is obviously
insufficient to protect a node against a determined and malicious
attack.

    It should be noted that it is not our current intent to prohibit
occasional use of DDT for communication between sites via "DDT"
messages.  Currently, there are two DDT commands, C and L, which set the
single-character message and multi-character message headers
respectively.  We will continue this facility, either by always
permitting the use of these DDT commands, or by implementing some new
code outside DDT for this purpose.










       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
       [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with    ]
       [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp.            10/99 ]

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMUncontrolled access to IMP DDT (the debugger on network IMPs) posed a security risk: attackers could intercept or tamper with network traffic, and unauthorized users could disrupt the network.
MECHANISMDDT access is restricted by requiring sense switch 4 to be turned on at the site, or a software override flag to be enabled. Only BBN's IMP teletype, TIP teletype, and a PDP-1 can enable the override. The Network Control Center monitors the status of these flags.
WHY IT MATTERSNetwork operators retained the ability they needed while making unauthorized DDT use harder. The measure was acknowledged to deter casual misuse but insufficient against determined attacks.

§1The Problem with Unrestricted DDT

RFC 521 describes a security concern raised at a workshop on ARPANET resource sharing: the IMP DDT tool, a debugger used to maintain the network's Interface Message Processors (IMPs), was available to anyone, making access control mechanisms vulnerable to interception or tampering.

DDT was necessary for the Network Control Center (NCC) to manage the network, and site personnel sometimes needed it for emergency recovery. However, as the ARPANET grew and took on more operational importance, controlling who could use such a powerful tool became essential.

The network had a powerful repair tool (DDT) that anyone on the network could use to spy on or break things. The people in charge needed to use it, but they needed to prevent troublemakers from doing the same.

§2Protecting DDT with Physical and Software Locks

BBN's solution required that sense switch 4 be turned on at the physical IMP location, or a software override flag be enabled. Only the BBN IMP teletype, the BBN TIP teletype, and a specific PDP-1 computer could enable the override from software. The NCC would monitor these flags and report any unauthorized changes.

All DDT commands that could affect the running IMP program were protected this way. Less dangerous DDT operations, like the C and L commands used to send control messages between sites, would remain available to avoid completely blocking inter-site communication.

To use the repair tool, you had to either flip a physical switch at the machine or send a special command from approved computers in Boston. The network managers watched to catch cheaters.

§3Balancing Security and Operations

The measure acknowledges a fundamental tension: the NCC needed unrestricted access to DDT for network operations and emergency recovery, while sites needed protection against unauthorized access. The solution preserves the NCC's capability to use DDT at any IMP while making unauthorized use harder. Physical switch control and software override flags provide a two-layer defense without completely blocking legitimate inter-site communication via DDT.

The tradeoff was clear: give operators the tools they need but make it harder for bad actors to sneak in.