RFC 3938 PROPOSED STANDARD EMAIL · REGISTRY

Video-Message Message-Context

One new Message-Context value, video-message, so mail programs can tell a video email from other kinds.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 2004
AUTHORS
T. Hansen
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 3458 — Message-Context header
NEW CONTEXT VALUE
video-message
REGISTRY
Internet Message Context Types
DOI
10.17487/RFC3938

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                          T. Hansen
Request for Comments: 3938                             AT&T Laboratories
Updates: 3458                                               October 2004
Category: Standards Track


                     Video-Message Message-Context

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).

Abstract

   The Message-Context header defined in RFC 3458 describes the context
   of a message (for example: fax-message or voice-message).  This
   specification extends the Message-Context header with one additional
   context value: "video-message".

   A receiving user agent (UA) may use this information as a hint to
   optimally present the message.

1.  Introduction

   Email messages can be used to convey many different forms of
   messages, and the user will interact with different types in
   different ways.  As explained in RFC 3458 [1], the "message context"
   of the message conveys information about the way the user expects to
   interact with the message, such as which icon to display.  RFC 3458
   then registers the message contexts for a "voice-message", "fax-
   message", "pager-message", "multimedia-message", "text-message", and
   "none".

2.  Video Message

   One form of email is a message that consists mostly of a video
   stream.  Examples of services that send video email are those
   connected to cell phones that capture video streams, and video email
   services that use webcams attached to a PC.  These email messages
   currently consist of two flavors, both of which can be properly
   considered a video message:

   1. those that embed the video stream internally within the message as
      a body part, and

   2. those whose video stream is stored on a third party's video
      server.

   However, none of the existing message contexts properly identify such
   video messages.  This specification extends the Message-Context
   header with one additional context value: video-message.

3.  IANA Considerations

3.1.  Message-Context

   As specified in RFC 3458 [1], this document registers "video-message"
   in the "Internet Message Context Types" repository.

   Message-Context class name:
      video-message

   Summary of the message class:
      Indicates a message whose primary content is a video mail message.
      The primary content is video data.  The context is usually a
      message recorded on a video camera, or a message whose primary
      purpose is to contain an external reference to a message recorded
      on a video camera.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
      Tony Hansen, tony+msgctxt@maillennium.att.com.

4.  Security Considerations

   This header is intended to be an indicator of message context only.
   As such, it is only a hint and requires no behavior on the part of a
   message user agent.

5.  Normative References

   [1]  Burger, E., Candell, E., Eliot, C., and G. Klyne, "Message
        Context for Internet Mail", RFC 3458, January 2003.

6.  Author's Address

   Tony Hansen
   AT&T Laboratories
   200 Laurel Ave.
   Middletown, NJ  07748
   USA

   EMail: tony+msgctxt@maillennium.att.com

7.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in IETF Documents can
   be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
   ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMEmail can carry video, but none of the Message-Context values from RFC 3458 properly identified a video message.
MECHANISMThis memo registers the value 'video-message' in the Internet Message Context Types repository, for messages whose primary content is video.
WHY IT MATTERSA receiving mail program may use the value as a hint for how to present the message. It requires no particular behaviour.

§1Message Context Background

The Message-Context header from RFC 3458 tells a mail program what kind of message it has, which affects things such as which icon to show. RFC 3458 registered the contexts voice-message, fax-message, pager-message, multimedia-message, text-message and none.

Mail can have a label saying what is inside, like 'voice' or 'fax'. This document adds a label for video.

§2Why Video Needs Its Own Value

Some email consists mostly of a video stream. The RFC gives examples of services connected to cell phones that capture video and video email services that use webcams on a PC. Such messages come in two flavours: the video is embedded in the message as a body part, or it is stored on a third party's video server.

Neither flavour is properly identified by an existing context, so the memo adds video-message.

Video can be inside the letter or kept at another place with a note pointing to it. Both need a 'video' label.

§3The Registration

The memo registers video-message in the "Internet Message Context Types" repository, as RFC 3458 specifies. The registered summary says it indicates a message whose primary content is a video mail message, usually recorded on a video camera, or whose main purpose is to hold an external reference to such a recording.

The new label goes into the official list of labels, with a short note about what it means.

§4Only a Hint

The header is intended to be an indicator of message context only. It is a hint and requires no behaviour on the part of a message user agent.

The label is just a helpful sticker. Nobody has to do anything special because of it.

§5References