RFC 3192 DRAFT STANDARD EMAIL · ADDRESSING · FAX

Fax Email Address: Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail

How to write a fax machine's telephone number as the local part of an ordinary email address.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 2001
AUTHORS
C. Allocchio
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 2304 — Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail, RFC 2846 — GSTN addressing in email
SERVICE-SELECTOR
FAX
SUBADDRESS KEYWORD
T33S (digits only)
PHONE NUMBER PREFIX
+
DOI
10.17487/RFC3192

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                       C. Allocchio
Request for Comments: 3192                                    GARR-Italy
Obsoletes: 2304                                             October 2001
Updates: 2846
Category: Standards Track


              Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This memo describes a simple method of encoding Global Switched
   Telephone Network (GSTN) addresses of facsimile devices in the
   local-part of Internet email addresses.

1. Introduction

   As with all Internet mail addresses, the left-hand-side (local-part)
   of an address generated according to this specification, is not to be
   interpreted except by the MTA that is named on the right-hand-side
   (domain).

   Since the very first e-mail to fax gateway objects appeared, a number
   of different methods to specify a fax address as an e-mail address
   have been used by implementors.  Several objectives for this methods
   have been identified, like to enable an e-mail user to send and
   receive faxes from his/her e-mail interface, to allow some kind of
   "fax over e-mail service" transport (possibly reducing the costs of
   GSTN long distance transmissions) while using the existing e-mail
   infrastructure.

   This memo describes the MINIMAL addressing method and standard
   extensions to encode FAX addresses into e-mail addresses, as required
   in reference [13].  The opposite problem, i.e., to allow a
   traditional numeric-only fax device user to access the e-mail
   transport service, is not discussed here.

   These IANA forms used to register the standard elements defined here
   are given in the "IANA Considerations" chapter (section 7 of this
   document).

   All implementations supporting FAX over e-mail address format MUST
   support this minimal specification.

1.1 Terminology and Syntax conventions

   In this document the formal definitions are described using ABNF
   syntax, as defined into [7].  We will also use some of the "CORE
   DEFINITIONS" defined in "APPENDIX A - CORE" of that document.  The
   exact meaning of the capitalized words

      "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
      "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", "OPTIONAL"

   is defined in reference [6].

   In this document the following new terms are also defined:

      I-fax device:
         an I-pstn device type [13] which is able to communicate either
         directly or indirectly with the traditional FAX over GSTN
         service;

      mta-I-fax:
         the Internet domain name which identifies uniquely an I-fax
         device over the Internet (see also mta-I-pstn in [13]);

      fax-email:
         the complete Internet e-mail address structure which is used to
         transport a FAX address over the Internet e-mail service (see
         also pstn-email in [13]).

2. Minimal Fax address

   The minimal fax address within e-mail has been defined for
   consistency with reference [13] and it contains two elements: the
   fax-mbox and an optional qualif-type1 element.

   More precisely the GSTN minimal address specification requires the
   use of a unique service-selector for each specific application
   (section 2 in [13]).

   The "service-selector" defined for the fax service is as follows:

      service-selector = "FAX"
   In the syntax for the fax address a qualif-type1 element has been
   defined for support of T.30/T.33 subaddresses (see section 2 of
   [13]).  The use of this element is OPTIONAL, but compliant
   implementations MUST be able to support and correctly interpret it
   when present.  Its definition is as follows:

      qualif-type1 = "/" t33-sep "=" sub-addr

   where

      t33-sep = "T33S"

      sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT )

   Thus, the minimal specification of a fax in e-mail address is:

      fax-address = fax-mbox [ "/T33S=" sub-addr ]

      fax-mbox = "FAX=" global-phone

   Notes:

      For the case of a single subaddress, only numbers are allowed in
      <sub-addr> which is consistent with T.30, T.33, and this document.
      While T.30 and T.33 use SPACE to pad its field, padding isn't
      necessary in the <sub-addr> field defined by this document.

      For the case of multiple subaddresses, T.33 specifies the "#"
      character be used to specify multiple subaddreses.  However, only
      digits are permitted in the <sub-addr> field defined by this
      document.  Refer to section 4.1 in case multiple <sub-addr> per
      per <fax-mbox> need to be specified.

   The Minimal supported syntax for global-phone (as described in
   section 2.1 of reference [13]) is:

   global-phone = "+" 1*( DIGIT / written-sep )

   written-sep = ( "-" / "." )

   Refer to section 2.1 in [13] for other important considerations about
   the global-phone element.

2.2 Some examples of a minimal "fax-address"

   Some examples of minimal fax-address follows:

      FAX=+3940226338

      FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387

      FAX=+33-1-88335215

   Note:

      the examples shown are just for illustration purposes.

3. The e-mail address of the I-fax device: mta-I-fax

   An "I-fax device" has, among its characteristics, a unique Internet
   domain name which identifies it on the Internet.  Within Internet
   mail, this is the Right Hand Side (RHS) part of the address, i.e.,
   the part on the right of the "@" sign.  For purposes of this document
   we will call this "mta-I-fax"

      mta-I-fax = domain

   For "domain" strings used in SMTP transmissions, the string MUST
   conform to the requirements of that standards <domain> specifications
   [1], [3].  For "domain" strings used in message content headers, the
   string MUST conform to the requirements of the relevant standards
   [2], [3].

   Note:

      the use of "domain names" or "domain literals" is permitted in
      addresses in both the SMTP envelope and message header fields.

4. The fax-email

   The complete structure used to transfer a minimal FAX address over
   the Internet e-mail transport system is called "fax-email".  This
   object is a an e-mail address which conforms to [2] and [3]
   "addr-spec" syntax, with structure refinements which allows the FAX
   number to be identified.

   fax-email = ["""] ["/"] fax-address ["/"] ["""] "@" mta-I-fax

   Implementors' note:

      The optional "/" characters can result from translations from
      other transport gateways (such as some X.400 gateways) which have
      included the "/" as an optional element.  Implementations MUST
      accept the optional slashes but SHOULD NOT generate them.
      Gateways are allowed to strip them off when converting to Internet
      mail addressing.  The relevant standard [2], [3] define exactly
      when the optional "quotes" characters surrounding the entire local
      part (i.e., the part on the left of the "@" character into the
      fax-email) MUST be added.

4.1 Multiple subaddresses

   There are some instances in GSTN applications where multiple
   subaddresses are used: T.33 subaddresses in fax service are one of
   these cases.  In e-mail practice a separate and unique e-mail address
   is always used for each recipient; as such, if multiple T.33
   subaddresses are present, the use of multiple "fax-email" elements is
   REQUIRED.

   Implementors' note:

      The UA MAY accept multiple subaddress elements for the same
      global-phone, but it MUST generate multiple "fax-mbox" elements
      when submitting the message to the MTA.

4.2 Some examples of minimal "fax-email"

      Some examples of minimal fax-email addresses follows:

      FAX=+3940226338@faxworld.org

      FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387@faxworld.org

      /FAX=+33-1-88335215/@faxworld.org

   Note:

      the examples shown are just for illustration purposes.

5. Conclusion

   This proposal creates a minimal standard encoding for FAX addresses
   within the global e-mail transport system.  The proposal is
   consistent with existing e-mail standards.

6. Security Considerations

   This document specifies a means by which FAX addresses can be encoded
   into e-mail addresses.  Since e-mail routing is determined by Domain
   Name System (DNS) data, a successful attack to DNS could disseminate
   tampered information, which causes e-mail messages to be diverted via
   some MTA or Gateway where the security of the software has been
   compromised.

   There are several means by which an attacker might be able to deliver
   incorrect mail routing information to a client.  These include: (a)
   compromise of a DNS server, (b) generating a counterfeit response to
   a client's DNS query, (c) returning incorrect "additional
   information" in response to an unrelated query.  Clients SHOULD
   ensure that mail routing is based only on authoritative answers.
   Once DNS Security mechanisms [5] become more widely deployed, clients
   SHOULD employ those mechanisms to verify the authenticity and
   integrity of mail routing records.

7. IANA Considerations

   The IANA registration forms for "FAX" service-selector and "T33S"
   qualif-type1 elements are defined here.  These forms update the
   previous registration forms defined in [15].

7.1 IANA Registration form for updated value of GSTN
    address service-selector "FAX"

   To: IANA@iana.org
   Subject: Registration of updated values for the GSTN address
   service-selector specifier "FAX"

   service-selector name:

      FAX

   Description of Use:

      FAX - specify that the GSTN address refers either to an
      Internet Fax device, or an onramp/offramp Fax gateway.

      For a complete description refer to RFC 3192 and RFC 3191.

   Security Considerations:

      See the Security Consideration section of RFC 3192.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:

   Claudio Allocchio
   INFN-GARR
   c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
   SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
   I 34012 Trieste
   Italy
   RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
   X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
   Phone:   +39 040 3758523
   Fax:     +39 040 3758565

7.2 IANA Registration form for updated value of GSTN
    address qualit-type1 keyword "T33S" and value

   To: IANA@iana.org
   Subject: Registration of updated values for the GSTN address
   qualif-type1 element "T33S"

   qualif-type1 "keyword" name:

      T33S

   qualif-type1 "value" ABNF definition:

      sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT )

   Description of Use:

      T33S is used to specify the numeric only optional fax sub-address
      element described in "ITU T.33 - Facsimile routing utilizing the
      subaddress; recommendation T.33 (July, 1996)".  Further detailed
      description is available in RFC 3192.

   Use Restriction:

      The use of "T33S" is restricted to "FAX" service-selector, is it
      has no meaning outside the fax service.

   Security Considerations:

      See the Security Consideration section of RFC 3192.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:

      Claudio Allocchio
      INFN-GARR
      c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
      SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
      I 34012 Trieste
      Italy
      RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
      X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
      Phone:   +39 040 3758523
      Fax:     +39 040 3758565

8. Changes since RFC 2304 specification

   Although there are no major or technical changes from RFC 2304
   specification, this section briefly describes where updates and
   clarifications were introduced:

   -  considering the case that telephony systems do not conform any
      more to the "single/few" Public Operator paradigm, the old
      definition "PSTN - Public Switched Telephone Network" was changed
      into the more adequate "GSTN - Global Switched Telephone Network"
      one.  However, in order to remain consistent with the previous
      specification, the ABNF variables names were not changed.

   -  section 7 "IANA Considerations" and the IANA registration forms
      for the "FAX" "service-selector" and for the "T33S" "qualif-type1"
      elements were added;

   -  an explicit list of "new terms" with explanations was added to
      section 1.1;

   -  the case when multiple T.33 subaddresses are present was described
      more explicitly in order to clarify how to handle them (section
      4.1);

   -  in section 3 the language describing "mta-I-fax" was updated to
      better describe its relationship with an Internet Mail address;

   -  in section 4., the quoting rules of the "fax-address" and their
      practical use was made explicit both in the definition of "fax-
      email" and in the Implementors' note;

   -  the Author's Address was updated;

   -  the References list was updates to substitute ITU E.164 (1991)
      with ITU E.164 (1997).

9. Author's Address

   Claudio Allocchio
   INFN-GARR
   c/o Sincrotrone Trieste
   SS 14 Km 163.5 Basovizza
   I 34012 Trieste
   Italy

   RFC2822: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
   X.400:   C=it;A=garr;P=garr;S=Allocchio;G=Claudio;
   Phone:   +39 040 3758523
   Fax:     +39 040 3758565

10. References

   [1]  Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821,
        August 1982.

   [2]  Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
        Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.

   [3]  Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet hosts - application and
        support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989.

   [4]  Malamud, C. and M. Rose, "Principles of Operation for the
        TPC.INT Subdomain: Remote Printing -- Technical Procedures", RFC
        1528, October 1993.

   [5]  Eastlake, D. and C. Kaufman, "Domain Name System Security
        Extensions", RFC 2065, January 1997.

   [6]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [7]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
        Specifications", RFC 2234, November 1997.

   [8]  ITU F.401 - Message Handling Services: Naming and Addressing for
        Public Message Handling Service; recommendation F.401 (August
        1992).

   [9]  ITU F.423 - Message Handling Services: Intercommunication
        Between the Interpersonal Messaging Service and the Telefax
        Service; recommendation F.423 (August 1992).

   [10] ITU E.164 - The International Public Telecommunication Numbering
        Plan E.164/I.331 (May 1997).

   [11] ITU T.33 - Facsimile routing utilizing the subaddress;
        recommendation T.33 (July 1996).

   [12] ETSI I-ETS 300,380 - Universal Personal Telecommunication (UPT):
        Access Devices Dual Tone Multi Frequency (DTMF) sender for
        acoustical coupling to the microphone of a handset telephone
        (March 1995).

   [13] Allocchio, C., "Minimal GSTN address format in Internet Mail",
        RFC 3191, October 2001.

   [14] Kille, S., "MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping
        between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME", RFC 2156, January 1998.

   [15] Allocchio, C., "GSTN address element extensions in e-mail
        services", RFC 2846, June 2000.

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMEarly email-to-fax gateways each wrote fax numbers into email addresses in their own way, so addresses were not portable between systems.
MECHANISMRFC 3192 defines a minimal format: the local part is FAX= followed by a global phone number, with an optional /T33S= numeric subaddress, and the part after the @ names the I-fax device.
WHY IT MATTERSIt obsoletes RFC 2304 with no major technical changes, and it updates RFC 2846. Implementations that support fax over email addresses MUST support this minimal format.

§1Why Fax Numbers Need a Standard Spelling

The left-hand side (the local part) of an email address is not interpreted by anyone except the mail transfer agent named on the right-hand side. Since the first email to fax gateways appeared, implementors have used several different ways to put a fax address into an email address.

The stated aims were to let an email user send and receive faxes from the email interface, and to allow a fax-over-email transport that could cut long distance telephone costs while using the existing email infrastructure. RFC 3192 describes the minimal addressing method and its standard extensions. The opposite problem, letting a traditional numeric-only fax user reach the email service, is out of scope.

All implementations that support the fax over email address format MUST support this minimal specification.

People used to write fax numbers inside email addresses in many different ways. This memo picks one simple way so everybody understands each other.

§1.1Terms and Syntax Conventions

The formal definitions use ABNF, with the core definitions from RFC 2234, and the capitalised requirement words are used as defined in RFC 2119. The memo adds three terms.

  • I-fax device: an I-pstn device type that can talk, directly or indirectly, to the traditional fax-over-GSTN service.
  • mta-I-fax: the Internet domain name that uniquely identifies an I-fax device on the Internet.
  • fax-email: the complete email address structure used to carry a fax address over Internet email.

The memo builds on RFC 3191, the general minimal GSTN address format, and takes its fax-specific rules from it.

The memo gives names to three things: the machine that handles faxes, its place on the Internet, and the finished email address.

§2The Minimal Fax Address

A minimal fax address has two parts: the fax-mbox and an optional qualif-type1 element. The service-selector for the fax service is the literal FAX.

The optional element carries a T.30/T.33 subaddress. Its use is OPTIONAL, but compliant implementations MUST be able to support and correctly interpret it when present. The full form is fax-address = fax-mbox [ "/T33S=" sub-addr ], with fax-mbox = "FAX=" global-phone.

The sub-addr is one or more digits only. T.30 and T.33 pad their field with spaces, but padding is not needed here. The minimal global-phone is a + followed by digits, with a hyphen or a full stop allowed as written separators.

A fax address starts with the word FAX, an equals sign and a phone number that begins with a plus. You can add a small extra number after it to say which desk or mailbox on that fax machine should get the page.

§3The Right-Hand Side: mta-I-fax

An I-fax device has a unique Internet domain name. In email terms this is the part to the right of the @ sign, called mta-I-fax here, and it is simply a domain.

In SMTP transmissions the string MUST conform to the SMTP domain specification, and in message headers it MUST conform to the relevant message-format standards. Both domain names and domain literals are permitted in the SMTP envelope and in header fields.

After the at sign goes the Internet name of the machine that will send the fax, just like in any other email address.

§4The Complete fax-email Address

The full address is called fax-email. It is an ordinary email addr-spec, refined so that the fax number can be identified: fax-email = ["""] ["/"] fax-address ["/"] ["""] "@" mta-I-fax.

The optional slashes can come from translations through other gateways, such as some X.400 gateways. Implementations MUST accept them but SHOULD NOT generate them. Gateways may strip them when converting to Internet mail.

The email standards define exactly when the quotation marks around the whole local part MUST be added.

If a fax number has several T.33 subaddresses, email practice of one address per recipient applies: multiple fax-email elements are REQUIRED. A user agent MAY accept several subaddress elements for one phone number, but it MUST generate multiple fax-mbox elements when it submits the message to the MTA.

If you want to fax the same machine for three different people, you write three separate email addresses, one for each person.

EXAMPLE FAX-EMAIL ADDRESSES FROM THE RFC
Minimal fax-email examples
FAX=+3940226338@faxworld.org
FAX=+12027653000/T33S=1387@faxworld.org
/FAX=+33-1-88335215/@faxworld.org

§6Security: Trusting DNS Routing

The memo only encodes fax addresses in email addresses, but email routing depends on DNS data. A successful attack on DNS could spread tampered information and divert messages through an MTA or gateway whose software has been compromised.

The RFC lists three ways an attacker might deliver wrong routing information: compromising a DNS server, forging a response to a client's DNS query, and returning incorrect additional information in answer to an unrelated query. Clients SHOULD base mail routing only on authoritative answers, and once DNS Security mechanisms are more widely deployed, SHOULD use them to verify the authenticity and integrity of mail routing records.

If a bad guy tricks the Internet phone book, your fax could be sent to the wrong place, so computers should only believe answers that come from the true source.

§7IANA Registrations

The RFC contains two IANA registration forms. They update the earlier forms in RFC 2846.

  • FAX as a GSTN address service-selector: it specifies that the address refers either to an Internet Fax device or to an onramp/offramp Fax gateway.
  • T33S as a qualif-type1 keyword with the value sub-addr = 1*( DIGIT ): it carries the numeric-only optional fax subaddress from ITU T.33. Its use is restricted to the FAX service-selector.

The memo asks the keeper of Internet name lists to write down the two special words FAX and T33S so nobody uses them for something else.

§8Changes Since RFC 2304

The RFC says there are no major or technical changes from RFC 2304, only updates and clarifications.

  • The old term PSTN was replaced by the more adequate GSTN (Global Switched Telephone Network), but the ABNF variable names were kept.
  • The IANA considerations section and registration forms were added.
  • A list of new terms was added, and the case of multiple T.33 subaddresses and the quoting rules were made explicit.
  • The wording describing mta-I-fax was updated, the author's address was updated, and the reference to ITU E.164 (1991) was replaced by E.164 (1997).

This version is the old rulebook with clearer wording and a few lists added, not a new game.

§9References