RFC 2086 PROPOSED STANDARD IMAP · EMAIL · ACCESS CONTROL

IMAP4 ACL extension

Control who can access shared mailboxes through IMAP.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
January 1997
AUTHORS
J. Myers
STREAM
Legacy
OBSOLETED BY
RFC 4314 — IMAP ACL
STANDARD RIGHTS CODES
9 single-letter codes (l, r, s, w, i, p, c, d, a)
SPECIAL IDENTIFIER
anyone (all users)
NEGATIVE RIGHTS
Prefix identifier with - to remove rights
DOI
10.17487/RFC2086

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                           J. Myers
Request for Comments: 2086                               Carnegie Mellon
Category: Standards Track                                   January 1997


                          IMAP4 ACL extension

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

1.   Abstract

   The ACL extension of the Internet Message Access Protocol [IMAP4]
   permits access control lists to be manipulated through the IMAP
   protocol.

Table of Contents

   1.   Abstract............................................... 1
   2.   Conventions Used in this Document...................... 1
   3.   Introduction and Overview.............................. 2
   4.   Commands............................................... 3
   4.1. SETACL................................................. 3
   4.2. DELETEACL.............................................. 4
   4.3. GETACL................................................. 4
   4.4. LISTRIGHTS............................................. 4
   4.5. MYRIGHTS............................................... 5
   5.   Responses.............................................. 5
   5.1. ACL.................................................... 5
   5.2. LISTRIGHTS............................................. 6
   5.3. MYRIGHTS............................................... 6
   6.   Formal Syntax.......................................... 6
   7.   References............................................. 7
   8.   Security Considerations................................ 7
   9.   Author's Address....................................... 8

2.   Conventions Used in this Document

   In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
   server respectively.

3.   Introduction and Overview

   The ACL extension is present in any IMAP4 implementation which
   returns "ACL" as one of the supported capabilities to the CAPABILITY
   command.

   An access control list is a set of <identifier,rights> pairs.

   Identifier is a US-ASCII string.  The identifier anyone is reserved
   to refer to the universal identity (all authentications, including
   anonymous). All user name strings accepted by the LOGIN or
   AUTHENTICATE commands to authenticate to the IMAP server are reserved
   as identifiers for the corresponding user.  Identifiers starting with
   a dash ("-") are reserved for "negative rights", described below.
   All other identifier strings are interpreted in an implementation-
   defined manner.

   Rights is a string listing a (possibly empty) set of alphanumeric
   characters, each character listing a set of operations which is being
   controlled. Letters are reserved for ``standard'' rights, listed
   below.  The set of standard rights may only be extended by a
   standards-track document.  Digits are reserved for implementation or
   site defined rights.  The currently defined standard rights are:

   l - lookup (mailbox is visible to LIST/LSUB commands)
   r - read (SELECT the mailbox, perform CHECK, FETCH, PARTIAL,
       SEARCH, COPY from mailbox)
   s - keep seen/unseen information across sessions (STORE SEEN flag)
   w - write (STORE flags other than SEEN and DELETED)
   i - insert (perform APPEND, COPY into mailbox)
   p - post (send mail to submission address for mailbox,
       not enforced by IMAP4 itself)
   c - create (CREATE new sub-mailboxes in any implementation-defined
       hierarchy)
   d - delete (STORE DELETED flag, perform EXPUNGE)
   a - administer (perform SETACL)

   An implementation may tie rights together or may force rights to
   always or never be granted to particular identifiers.  For example,
   in an implementation that uses unix mode bits, the rights "wisd" are
   tied, the "a" right is always granted to the owner of a mailbox and
   is never granted to another user.  If rights are tied in an
   implementation, the implementation must be conservative in granting
   rights in response to SETACL commands--unless all rights in a tied
   set are specified, none of that set should be included in the ACL
   entry for that identifier.  A client may discover the set of rights
   which may be granted to a given identifier in the ACL for a given
   mailbox by using the LISTRIGHTS command.

   It is possible for multiple identifiers in an access control list to
   apply to a given user (or other authentication identity).  For
   example, an ACL may include rights to be granted to the identifier
   matching the user, one or more implementation-defined identifiers
   matching groups which include the user, and/or the identifier
   "anyone".  How these rights are combined to determine the user's
   access is implementation-defined.  An implementation may choose, for
   example, to use the union of the rights granted to the applicable
   identifiers.  An implementation may instead choose, for example, to
   only use those rights granted to the most specific identifier present
   in the ACL. A client may determine the set of rights granted to the
   logged-in user for a given mailbox by using the MYRIGHTS command.

   When an identifier in an ACL starts with a dash ("-"), that indicates
   that associated rights are to be removed from the identifier that is
   prefixed by the dash.  For example, if the identifier "-fred" is
   granted the "w" right, that indicates that the "w" right is to be
   removed from users matching the identifier "fred".  Implementations
   need not support having identifiers which start with a dash in ACLs.

4.   Commands

4.1. SETACL

   Arguments:  mailbox name
               authentication identifier
               access right modification

   Data:       no specific data for this command

   Result:     OK - setacl completed
               NO - setacl failure: can't set acl
              BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

      The SETACL command changes the access control list on the
      specified mailbox so that the specified identifier is granted
      permissions as specified in the third argument.

      The third argument is a string containing an optional plus ("+")
      or minus ("-") prefix, followed by zero or more rights characters.
      If the string starts with a plus, the following rights are added
      to any existing rights for the identifier.  If the string starts
      with a minus, the following rights are removed from any existing
      rights for the identifier.  If the string does not start with a
      plus or minus, the rights replace any existing rights for the
      identifier.

4.2. DELETEACL

   Arguments:  mailbox name
               authentication identifier

   Data:       no specific data for this command

   Result:     OK - deleteacl completed
               NO - deleteacl failure: can't delete acl
              BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

      The DELETEACL command removes any <identifier,rights> pair for the
      specified identifier from the access control list for the specified
      mailbox.

4.3. GETACL

   Arguments:  mailbox name

   Data:       untagged responses: ACL

   Result:     OK - getacl completed
               NO - getacl failure: can't get acl
              BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

      The GETACL command returns the access control list for mailbox in
      an untagged ACL reply.

   Example:    C: A002 GETACL INBOX
               S: * ACL INBOX Fred rwipslda
               S: A002 OK Getacl complete

4.4. LISTRIGHTS

   Arguments:  mailbox name
               authentication identifier

   Data:       untagged responses: LISTRIGHTS

   Result:     OK - listrights completed
               NO - listrights failure: can't get rights list
              BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

      The LISTRIGHTS command takes a mailbox name and an identifier and
      returns information about what rights may be granted to the identifier
      in the ACL for the mailbox.

   Example:    C: a001 LISTRIGHTS ~/Mail/saved smith
               S: * LISTRIGHTS ~/Mail/saved smith la r swicd
               S: a001 OK Listrights completed


               C: a005 LISTRIGHTS archive.imap anyone
               S: * LISTRIGHTS archive.imap anyone "" l r s w i p c d a
               0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

4.5. MYRIGHTS

   Arguments:  mailbox name

   Data:       untagged responses: MYRIGHTS

   Result:     OK - myrights completed
               NO - myrights failure: can't get rights
              BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

      The MYRIGHTS command returns the set of rights that the user has
      to mailbox in an untagged MYRIGHTS reply.

   Example:    C: A003 MYRIGHTS INBOX
               S: * MYRIGHTS INBOX rwipslda
               S: A003 OK Myrights complete

5.   Responses

5.1. ACL

   Data:       mailbox name
               zero or more identifier rights pairs

      The ACL response occurs as a result of a GETACL command. The first
      string is the mailbox name for which this ACL applies.  This is
      followed by zero or more pairs of strings, each pair contains the
      identifier for which the entry applies followed by the set of
      rights that the identifier has.

5.2. LISTRIGHTS

   Data:       mailbox name
               identifier
               required rights
               list of optional rights

      The LISTRIGHTS response occurs as a result of a LISTRIGHTS
      command. The first two strings are the mailbox name and identifier
      for which this rights list applies.  Following the identifier is a
      string containing the (possibly empty) set of rights the
      identifier will always be granted in the mailbox.

      Following this are zero or more strings each containing a set of
      rights the identifier may be granted in the mailbox.  Rights
      mentioned in the same string are tied together--either all must be
      granted to the identifier in the mailbox or none may be granted.

      The same right may not be listed more than once in the LISTRIGHTS
      command.

5.3. MYRIGHTS

   Data:       mailbox name
               rights

      The MYRIGHTS response occurs as a result of a MYRIGHTS command.
      The first string is the mailbox name for which these rights apply.
      The second string is the set of rights that the client has.

6.   Formal Syntax

   The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur
   Form (BNF) notation as specified in [RFC-822] as modified by [IMAP4].
   Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by
   [IMAP4].

   Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
   insensitive.  The use of upper or lower case characters to define
   token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST
   accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.

   acl_data        ::= "ACL" SPACE mailbox *(SPACE identifier SPACE
                        rights)

   deleteacl       ::= "DELETEACL" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier

   getacl          ::= "GETACL" SPACE mailbox

   identifier      ::= astring

   listrights      ::= "LISTRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier

   listrights_data ::= "LISTRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier
                           SPACE rights *(SPACE rights)

   mod_rights      ::= astring
                           ;; +rights to add, -rights to remove
                           ;; rights to replace

   myrights        ::= "MYRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox

   myrights_data   ::= "MYRIGHTS" SPACE mailbox SPACE rights

   rights          ::= astring

   setacl          ::= "SETACL" SPACE mailbox SPACE identifier
                       SPACE mod_rights

7.   References

   [IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4",
   RFC 1730, University of Washington, December 1994.

   [RFC-822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
   Messages", STD 11, RFC 822.

8.   Security Considerations

   An implementation must make sure the ACL commands themselves do not
   give information about mailboxes with appropriately restricted ACL's.
   For example, a GETACL command on a mailbox for which the user has
   insufficient rights should not admit the mailbox exists, much less
   return the mailbox's ACL.

9.   Author's Address

   John G. Myers
   Carnegie-Mellon University
   5000 Forbes Ave.
   Pittsburgh PA, 15213-3890

   Email: jgm+@cmu.edu

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMEmail users need to share mailboxes with colleagues, but IMAP had no way to specify who can do what with a mailbox (read it, add messages, delete messages, or manage permissions). Each implementation had different ad-hoc solutions.
MECHANISMRFC 2086 adds five new IMAP commands to manage access control lists: SETACL (grant or revoke rights), DELETEACL (remove an ACL entry), GETACL (list who has access), LISTRIGHTS (show what rights can be granted to someone), and MYRIGHTS (show your own rights). Each entry pairs an identifier (user or group) with a set of single-letter rights.
WHY IT MATTERSShared mailboxes can now be configured through IMAP itself, letting users control permissions without command-line administration. It was refined by RFC 4314, which is now the standard.

§1Shared Mailboxes in IMAP

IMAP is a protocol for managing email, but it had no standard way to control who can access which mailboxes. Organizations often need shared mailboxes--folders that multiple people can access, such as a customer support inbox or a department mailbox. Without access control, administrators had to use system-level commands, and users had no way to manage permissions themselves.

RFC 2086 adds an ACL extension to IMAP that lets access control be managed through the same protocol used for reading mail. An ACL (access control list) is a set of entries, each specifying what a user or group can do with a mailbox.

Sometimes multiple people need to use the same email folder. This RFC lets you say which people can use it and what they can do: read messages, add messages, delete messages, or change the permissions.

§2Identifiers and Rights

Each ACL entry pairs an identifier with a set of rights. An identifier is a user name, a group name, or the special identifier anyone (meaning all users, including unauthenticated ones). Identifiers starting with a dash (for example, -fred) represent negative rights: they remove permissions from a user instead of granting them.

Rights are single-letter codes that control what operations are allowed: l for lookup (mailbox visible in LIST/LSUB), r for read (SELECT and FETCH), s for seen status, w for write (store flags), i for insert (APPEND/COPY), p for post (send to submission address), c for create (sub-mailboxes), d for delete (EXPUNGE), and a for administer (change ACL).

An implementation may tie certain rights together; for example, granting the write right might automatically include the seen right. Clients can query which rights can be granted using the LISTRIGHTS command.

The ACL lists users and what they can do. A user can read, write, delete, create folders, or manage permissions. Different systems may tie some rights together, so if you can write, you might automatically be able to mark messages as seen.

Standard access control rights (RFC 2086)
  • lLookup — Mailbox is visible in LIST and LSUB commands.
  • rRead — Can SELECT mailbox and FETCH messages.
  • sSeen — Can store SEEN flag across sessions.
  • wWrite — Can store flags other than SEEN and DELETED.
  • iInsert — Can APPEND or COPY messages into mailbox.
  • pPost — Can send mail to mailbox submission address.
  • cCreate — Can create sub-mailboxes.
  • dDelete — Can store DELETED flag and EXPUNGE.
  • aAdminister — Can run SETACL to change ACL.

§3ACL Commands

The ACL extension adds five new commands to IMAP:

SETACL (mailbox identifier rights): Grants or revokes permissions. The rights string may start with a plus sign (add rights), a minus sign (remove rights), or neither (replace all rights). For example, SETACL INBOX bob +ri grants bob read and insert rights, while SETACL INBOX bob minus d revokes delete rights.

DELETEACL (mailbox identifier): Removes all permissions for an identifier from a mailbox's ACL.

GETACL (mailbox): Returns the entire ACL for a mailbox, listing all identifier and rights pairs.

LISTRIGHTS (mailbox identifier): Tells what rights could be granted to an identifier. Some systems may force certain rights together or prohibit granting certain rights. The response includes required rights (always granted) and optional rights (may or may not be granted).

MYRIGHTS (mailbox): Returns the set of rights the logged-in user has for that mailbox.

You can add or remove permissions with SETACL, delete all permissions with DELETEACL, see who has access with GETACL, ask what permissions are possible with LISTRIGHTS, and check your own permissions with MYRIGHTS.

§4Security and Access Control

Access control lists only work if the IMAP server enforces them correctly. A crucial security requirement is that ACL commands must not leak information. For example, a GETACL command on a mailbox the user does not have permission to access should not reveal the ACL or even admit the mailbox exists. The server must treat lack of access as if the mailbox does not exist.

The anyone identifier applies to all users, including unauthenticated ones. Implementations must be careful not to grant dangerous rights (like delete or administer) to anyone unless intended.

Implementers have flexibility in how they combine rights from multiple ACL entries that apply to a user. Some systems union the rights; others use the most specific matching entry. Clients cannot assume a particular strategy and should verify permissions using MYRIGHTS.

The system must not let you see who has access to a folder you cannot access yourself. If you grant permission to anyone, all users (even unauthenticated ones) get it, so be careful.

§5References