RFC 1928 PROPOSED STANDARD PROXY · FIREWALL · TRANSPORT

SOCKS5: SOCKS Protocol Version 5

A general framework that lets TCP and UDP applications pass through a firewall via a SOCKS server, with pluggable authentication.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
March 1996
AUTHORS
M. Leech, M. Ganis, Y. Lee, R. Kuris, D. Koblas, L. Jones
STREAM
IETF
CONVENTIONAL PORT
TCP 1080
PROTOCOL VERSION
X'05'
METHODS PER GREETING
1 to 255
IPV6 ADDRESS LENGTH
16 octets
FAILURE CLOSE DEADLINE
within 10 seconds
REASSEMBLY TIMER
no less than 5 seconds
DOI
10.17487/RFC1928
ERRATA
Reported errata

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                           M. Leech
Request for Comments: 1928                    Bell-Northern Research Ltd
Category: Standards Track                                       M. Ganis
                                         International Business Machines
                                                                  Y. Lee
                                                  NEC Systems Laboratory
                                                                R. Kuris
                                                       Unify Corporation
                                                               D. Koblas
                                                  Independent Consultant
                                                                L. Jones
                                                 Hewlett-Packard Company
                                                              March 1996


                        SOCKS Protocol Version 5

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Acknowledgments

   This memo describes a protocol that is an evolution of the previous
   version of the protocol, version 4 [1]. This new protocol stems from
   active discussions and prototype implementations.  The key
   contributors are: Marcus Leech: Bell-Northern Research, David Koblas:
   Independent Consultant, Ying-Da Lee: NEC Systems Laboratory, LaMont
   Jones: Hewlett-Packard Company, Ron Kuris: Unify Corporation, Matt
   Ganis: International Business Machines.

1.  Introduction

   The use of network firewalls, systems that effectively isolate an
   organizations internal network structure from an exterior network,
   such as the INTERNET is becoming increasingly popular.  These
   firewall systems typically act as application-layer gateways between
   networks, usually offering controlled TELNET, FTP, and SMTP access.
   With the emergence of more sophisticated application layer protocols
   designed to facilitate global information discovery, there exists a
   need to provide a general framework for these protocols to
   transparently and securely traverse a firewall.

   There exists, also, a need for strong authentication of such
   traversal in as fine-grained a manner as is practical. This
   requirement stems from the realization that client-server
   relationships emerge between the networks of various organizations,
   and that such relationships need to be controlled and often strongly
   authenticated.

   The protocol described here is designed to provide a framework for
   client-server applications in both the TCP and UDP domains to
   conveniently and securely use the services of a network firewall.
   The protocol is conceptually a "shim-layer" between the application
   layer and the transport layer, and as such does not provide network-
   layer gateway services, such as forwarding of ICMP messages.

2.  Existing practice

   There currently exists a protocol, SOCKS Version 4, that provides for
   unsecured firewall traversal for TCP-based client-server
   applications, including TELNET, FTP and the popular information-
   discovery protocols such as HTTP, WAIS and GOPHER.

   This new protocol extends the SOCKS Version 4 model to include UDP,
   and extends the framework to include provisions for generalized
   strong authentication schemes, and extends the addressing scheme to
   encompass domain-name and V6 IP addresses.

   The implementation of the SOCKS protocol typically involves the
   recompilation or relinking of TCP-based client applications to use
   the appropriate encapsulation routines in the SOCKS library.

Note:

   Unless otherwise noted, the decimal numbers appearing in packet-
   format diagrams represent the length of the corresponding field, in
   octets.  Where a given octet must take on a specific value, the
   syntax X'hh' is used to denote the value of the single octet in that
   field. When the word 'Variable' is used, it indicates that the
   corresponding field has a variable length defined either by an
   associated (one or two octet) length field, or by a data type field.

3.  Procedure for TCP-based clients

   When a TCP-based client wishes to establish a connection to an object
   that is reachable only via a firewall (such determination is left up
   to the implementation), it must open a TCP connection to the
   appropriate SOCKS port on the SOCKS server system.  The SOCKS service
   is conventionally located on TCP port 1080.  If the connection
   request succeeds, the client enters a negotiation for the
   authentication method to be used, authenticates with the chosen
   method, then sends a relay request.  The SOCKS server evaluates the
   request, and either establishes the appropriate connection or denies
   it.

   Unless otherwise noted, the decimal numbers appearing in packet-
   format diagrams represent the length of the corresponding field, in
   octets.  Where a given octet must take on a specific value, the
   syntax X'hh' is used to denote the value of the single octet in that
   field. When the word 'Variable' is used, it indicates that the
   corresponding field has a variable length defined either by an
   associated (one or two octet) length field, or by a data type field.

   The client connects to the server, and sends a version
   identifier/method selection message:

                   +----+----------+----------+
                   |VER | NMETHODS | METHODS  |
                   +----+----------+----------+
                   | 1  |    1     | 1 to 255 |
                   +----+----------+----------+

   The VER field is set to X'05' for this version of the protocol.  The
   NMETHODS field contains the number of method identifier octets that
   appear in the METHODS field.

   The server selects from one of the methods given in METHODS, and
   sends a METHOD selection message:

                         +----+--------+
                         |VER | METHOD |
                         +----+--------+
                         | 1  |   1    |
                         +----+--------+

   If the selected METHOD is X'FF', none of the methods listed by the
   client are acceptable, and the client MUST close the connection.

   The values currently defined for METHOD are:

          o  X'00' NO AUTHENTICATION REQUIRED
          o  X'01' GSSAPI
          o  X'02' USERNAME/PASSWORD
          o  X'03' to X'7F' IANA ASSIGNED
          o  X'80' to X'FE' RESERVED FOR PRIVATE METHODS
          o  X'FF' NO ACCEPTABLE METHODS

   The client and server then enter a method-specific sub-negotiation.

   Descriptions of the method-dependent sub-negotiations appear in
   separate memos.

   Developers of new METHOD support for this protocol should contact
   IANA for a METHOD number.  The ASSIGNED NUMBERS document should be
   referred to for a current list of METHOD numbers and their
   corresponding protocols.

   Compliant implementations MUST support GSSAPI and SHOULD support
   USERNAME/PASSWORD authentication methods.

4.  Requests

   Once the method-dependent subnegotiation has completed, the client
   sends the request details.  If the negotiated method includes
   encapsulation for purposes of integrity checking and/or
   confidentiality, these requests MUST be encapsulated in the method-
   dependent encapsulation.

   The SOCKS request is formed as follows:

        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+
        |VER | CMD |  RSV  | ATYP | DST.ADDR | DST.PORT |
        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+
        | 1  |  1  | X'00' |  1   | Variable |    2     |
        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+

     Where:

          o  VER    protocol version: X'05'
          o  CMD
             o  CONNECT X'01'
             o  BIND X'02'
             o  UDP ASSOCIATE X'03'
          o  RSV    RESERVED
          o  ATYP   address type of following address
             o  IP V4 address: X'01'
             o  DOMAINNAME: X'03'
             o  IP V6 address: X'04'
          o  DST.ADDR       desired destination address
          o  DST.PORT desired destination port in network octet
             order

   The SOCKS server will typically evaluate the request based on source
   and destination addresses, and return one or more reply messages, as
   appropriate for the request type.

5.  Addressing

   In an address field (DST.ADDR, BND.ADDR), the ATYP field specifies
   the type of address contained within the field:

          o  X'01'

   the address is a version-4 IP address, with a length of 4 octets

          o  X'03'

   the address field contains a fully-qualified domain name.  The first
   octet of the address field contains the number of octets of name that
   follow, there is no terminating NUL octet.

          o  X'04'

   the address is a version-6 IP address, with a length of 16 octets.

6.  Replies

   The SOCKS request information is sent by the client as soon as it has
   established a connection to the SOCKS server, and completed the
   authentication negotiations.  The server evaluates the request, and
   returns a reply formed as follows:

        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+
        |VER | REP |  RSV  | ATYP | BND.ADDR | BND.PORT |
        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+
        | 1  |  1  | X'00' |  1   | Variable |    2     |
        +----+-----+-------+------+----------+----------+

     Where:

          o  VER    protocol version: X'05'
          o  REP    Reply field:
             o  X'00' succeeded
             o  X'01' general SOCKS server failure
             o  X'02' connection not allowed by ruleset
             o  X'03' Network unreachable
             o  X'04' Host unreachable
             o  X'05' Connection refused
             o  X'06' TTL expired
             o  X'07' Command not supported
             o  X'08' Address type not supported
             o  X'09' to X'FF' unassigned
          o  RSV    RESERVED
          o  ATYP   address type of following address
             o  IP V4 address: X'01'
             o  DOMAINNAME: X'03'
             o  IP V6 address: X'04'
          o  BND.ADDR       server bound address
          o  BND.PORT       server bound port in network octet order

   Fields marked RESERVED (RSV) must be set to X'00'.

   If the chosen method includes encapsulation for purposes of
   authentication, integrity and/or confidentiality, the replies are
   encapsulated in the method-dependent encapsulation.

CONNECT

   In the reply to a CONNECT, BND.PORT contains the port number that the
   server assigned to connect to the target host, while BND.ADDR
   contains the associated IP address.  The supplied BND.ADDR is often
   different from the IP address that the client uses to reach the SOCKS
   server, since such servers are often multi-homed.  It is expected
   that the SOCKS server will use DST.ADDR and DST.PORT, and the
   client-side source address and port in evaluating the CONNECT
   request.

BIND

   The BIND request is used in protocols which require the client to
   accept connections from the server.  FTP is a well-known example,
   which uses the primary client-to-server connection for commands and
   status reports, but may use a server-to-client connection for
   transferring data on demand (e.g. LS, GET, PUT).

   It is expected that the client side of an application protocol will
   use the BIND request only to establish secondary connections after a
   primary connection is established using CONNECT.  In is expected that
   a SOCKS server will use DST.ADDR and DST.PORT in evaluating the BIND
   request.

   Two replies are sent from the SOCKS server to the client during a
   BIND operation.  The first is sent after the server creates and binds
   a new socket.  The BND.PORT field contains the port number that the
   SOCKS server assigned to listen for an incoming connection.  The
   BND.ADDR field contains the associated IP address.  The client will
   typically use these pieces of information to notify (via the primary
   or control connection) the application server of the rendezvous
   address.  The second reply occurs only after the anticipated incoming
   connection succeeds or fails.

   In the second reply, the BND.PORT and BND.ADDR fields contain the
   address and port number of the connecting host.

UDP ASSOCIATE

   The UDP ASSOCIATE request is used to establish an association within
   the UDP relay process to handle UDP datagrams.  The DST.ADDR and
   DST.PORT fields contain the address and port that the client expects
   to use to send UDP datagrams on for the association.  The server MAY
   use this information to limit access to the association.  If the
   client is not in possesion of the information at the time of the UDP
   ASSOCIATE, the client MUST use a port number and address of all
   zeros.

   A UDP association terminates when the TCP connection that the UDP
   ASSOCIATE request arrived on terminates.

   In the reply to a UDP ASSOCIATE request, the BND.PORT and BND.ADDR
   fields indicate the port number/address where the client MUST send
   UDP request messages to be relayed.

Reply Processing

   When a reply (REP value other than X'00') indicates a failure, the
   SOCKS server MUST terminate the TCP connection shortly after sending
   the reply.  This must be no more than 10 seconds after detecting the
   condition that caused a failure.

   If the reply code (REP value of X'00') indicates a success, and the
   request was either a BIND or a CONNECT, the client may now start
   passing data.  If the selected authentication method supports
   encapsulation for the purposes of integrity, authentication and/or
   confidentiality, the data are encapsulated using the method-dependent
   encapsulation.  Similarly, when data arrives at the SOCKS server for
   the client, the server MUST encapsulate the data as appropriate for
   the authentication method in use.

7.  Procedure for UDP-based clients

   A UDP-based client MUST send its datagrams to the UDP relay server at
   the UDP port indicated by BND.PORT in the reply to the UDP ASSOCIATE
   request.  If the selected authentication method provides
   encapsulation for the purposes of authenticity, integrity, and/or
   confidentiality, the datagram MUST be encapsulated using the
   appropriate encapsulation.  Each UDP datagram carries a UDP request
   header with it:

      +----+------+------+----------+----------+----------+
      |RSV | FRAG | ATYP | DST.ADDR | DST.PORT |   DATA   |
      +----+------+------+----------+----------+----------+
      | 2  |  1   |  1   | Variable |    2     | Variable |
      +----+------+------+----------+----------+----------+

     The fields in the UDP request header are:

          o  RSV  Reserved X'0000'
          o  FRAG    Current fragment number
          o  ATYP    address type of following addresses:
             o  IP V4 address: X'01'
             o  DOMAINNAME: X'03'
             o  IP V6 address: X'04'
          o  DST.ADDR       desired destination address
          o  DST.PORT       desired destination port
          o  DATA     user data

   When a UDP relay server decides to relay a UDP datagram, it does so
   silently, without any notification to the requesting client.
   Similarly, it will drop datagrams it cannot or will not relay.  When
   a UDP relay server receives a reply datagram from a remote host, it
   MUST encapsulate that datagram using the above UDP request header,
   and any authentication-method-dependent encapsulation.

   The UDP relay server MUST acquire from the SOCKS server the expected
   IP address of the client that will send datagrams to the BND.PORT
   given in the reply to UDP ASSOCIATE.  It MUST drop any datagrams
   arriving from any source IP address other than the one recorded for
   the particular association.

   The FRAG field indicates whether or not this datagram is one of a
   number of fragments.  If implemented, the high-order bit indicates
   end-of-fragment sequence, while a value of X'00' indicates that this
   datagram is standalone.  Values between 1 and 127 indicate the
   fragment position within a fragment sequence.  Each receiver will
   have a REASSEMBLY QUEUE and a REASSEMBLY TIMER associated with these
   fragments.  The reassembly queue must be reinitialized and the
   associated fragments abandoned whenever the REASSEMBLY TIMER expires,
   or a new datagram arrives carrying a FRAG field whose value is less
   than the highest FRAG value processed for this fragment sequence.
   The reassembly timer MUST be no less than 5 seconds.  It is
   recommended that fragmentation be avoided by applications wherever
   possible.

   Implementation of fragmentation is optional; an implementation that
   does not support fragmentation MUST drop any datagram whose FRAG
   field is other than X'00'.

   The programming interface for a SOCKS-aware UDP MUST report an
   available buffer space for UDP datagrams that is smaller than the
   actual space provided by the operating system:

          o  if ATYP is X'01' - 10+method_dependent octets smaller
          o  if ATYP is X'03' - 262+method_dependent octets smaller
          o  if ATYP is X'04' - 20+method_dependent octets smaller

8.  Security Considerations

   This document describes a protocol for the application-layer
   traversal of IP network firewalls.  The security of such traversal is
   highly dependent on the particular authentication and encapsulation
   methods provided in a particular implementation, and selected during
   negotiation between SOCKS client and SOCKS server.

   Careful consideration should be given by the administrator to the
   selection of authentication methods.

9.  References

   [1] Koblas, D., "SOCKS", Proceedings: 1992 Usenix Security Symposium.

Author's Address

       Marcus Leech
       Bell-Northern Research Ltd
       P.O. Box 3511, Stn. C,
       Ottawa, ON
       CANADA K1Y 4H7

       Phone: (613) 763-9145
       EMail: mleech@bnr.ca

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMFirewalls isolate an internal network, and applications need a general, authenticated way to traverse them rather than relying on per-protocol gateways.
MECHANISMThe client opens a TCP connection to the SOCKS server, negotiates an authentication method, then sends a CONNECT, BIND or UDP ASSOCIATE request and gets back a reply with a bound address and port.
WHY IT MATTERSVersion 5 extends SOCKS version 4 with UDP support, strong authentication methods and domain-name and IPv6 addressing.

§1Why SOCKS Exists

Network firewalls isolate an organization's internal network from an outside network such as the Internet. They typically act as application-layer gateways offering controlled TELNET, FTP and SMTP access. As more sophisticated application protocols appeared, a general framework was needed for them to traverse a firewall transparently and securely, with strong authentication as fine-grained as practical.

SOCKS version 5 is conceptually a shim layer between the application layer and the transport layer. For that reason it does not provide network-layer gateway services such as forwarding ICMP messages.

It evolves SOCKS version 4, which gave unsecured firewall traversal for TCP applications. Version 5 adds UDP, a framework for generalized strong authentication, and addressing by domain name and IPv6 address. Using SOCKS typically means recompiling or relinking TCP client applications with a SOCKS library.

A company keeps its computers behind a wall. SOCKS is the single gate in that wall, and it checks who you are before it lets your messages through.

§2Connecting and Choosing Authentication

A TCP client that needs to reach something only reachable through the firewall opens a TCP connection to the SOCKS server, conventionally on TCP port 1080. It then negotiates an authentication method, authenticates, and sends a relay request. The server either sets up the connection or denies it.

The client first sends a version identifier and method selection message: a VER octet (X'05'), an NMETHODS octet and one to 255 method octets. The server picks one and replies with VER and METHOD. If the chosen method is X'FF', none of the offered methods is acceptable and the client MUST close the connection.

Compliant implementations MUST support GSSAPI and SHOULD support USERNAME/PASSWORD. After selection, the client and server run a method-specific sub-negotiation, described in separate memos. If the method provides encapsulation for integrity or confidentiality, later requests and replies MUST use it.

First you knock and say which ways you can prove who you are, such as a password. The doorman picks one, or tells you none of them is good enough and you must leave.

TCP CLIENT SETUP (RFC 1928)
ClientSOCKS server
  1. VER, NMETHODS, METHODSOffers authentication methods.
  2. VER, METHODX'FF' means none acceptable.
  3. Method sub-negotiationDefined in separate memos.
  4. Request (CMD, ATYP, DST.ADDR, DST.PORT)
  5. Reply (REP, ATYP, BND.ADDR, BND.PORT)

§3Requests and Addresses

Once authentication is done, the client sends a request: VER, CMD, a reserved octet X'00', ATYP, DST.ADDR and a two-octet DST.PORT in network octet order. There are three commands.

  • CONNECT (X'01') asks the server to connect to the destination.
  • BIND (X'02') is for protocols where the client must accept a connection from the server. FTP is the example, with data transfers coming back from server to client. It is expected to be used only for secondary connections after a primary one is set up with CONNECT.
  • UDP ASSOCIATE (X'03') sets up a UDP relay association.

The ATYP field says what kind of address follows: X'01' is an IPv4 address of 4 octets, X'04' is an IPv6 address of 16 octets, and X'03' is a fully-qualified domain name whose first octet gives the number of name octets that follow, with no terminating NUL.

The server typically evaluates the request using the source and destination addresses.

After you are let in, you tell the doorman what you want: call this address, wait here for someone to call me, or pass along some quick postcards. You can name the place by number or by its name.

§4Replies and Command Behaviour

The server answers with VER, REP, a reserved octet, ATYP, BND.ADDR and BND.PORT. REP of X'00' means success; other values name the failure. Reserved fields are set to X'00'.

For CONNECT, the bound address and port are what the server assigned to connect to the target. This address often differs from the one the client used to reach the server, since such servers are often multi-homed.

For BIND, the server sends two replies. The first comes after it creates and binds a socket and gives the address and port it is listening on, which the client typically passes to the application server over the primary connection. The second comes after the incoming connection succeeds or fails and carries the address and port of the connecting host.

For UDP ASSOCIATE, DST.ADDR and DST.PORT say where the client expects to send UDP from; if it does not know yet it MUST use all zeros. The reply's bound address and port say where the client MUST send UDP messages to be relayed. The association ends when the TCP connection that carried the request ends.

When a reply signals failure, the server MUST terminate the TCP connection shortly after, no more than 10 seconds after detecting the cause. After a successful CONNECT or BIND the client may pass data, using method-dependent encapsulation if the method has any.

The doorman tells you whether it worked, and if not, why: the line was busy, the place does not exist, or the rules say no. If he says no, he hangs up soon after.

REPLY CODES IN THE REP FIELD
  • X'00'succeeded — The request worked.
  • X'01'general SOCKS server failure — Unspecified server problem.
  • X'02'connection not allowed by ruleset — Refused by the server's rules.
  • X'03'Network unreachable — No route to the network.
  • X'04'Host unreachable — The host could not be reached.
  • X'05'Connection refused — The target refused the connection.
  • X'06'TTL expired — Time to live ran out.
  • X'07'Command not supported — The CMD is not supported.
  • X'08'Address type not supported — The ATYP is not supported.

§5Relaying UDP Datagrams

A UDP client MUST send its datagrams to the UDP port given in BND.PORT of the UDP ASSOCIATE reply, wrapped in any method-dependent encapsulation. Each datagram carries a UDP request header: a two-octet reserved field X'0000', a one-octet FRAG, ATYP, DST.ADDR, DST.PORT and then the data.

The relay forwards datagrams silently, with no notice to the client, and drops those it cannot or will not relay. Replies from remote hosts are wrapped in the same header. The relay MUST learn from the SOCKS server the expected client IP address for the association and MUST drop datagrams from any other source address.

Fragmentation is optional. In FRAG, the high-order bit marks the end of a fragment sequence, X'00' means a standalone datagram, and values 1 to 127 give the position. Receivers keep a reassembly queue and timer, and the timer MUST be no less than 5 seconds. An implementation without fragmentation MUST drop any datagram whose FRAG is not X'00'. Applications are advised to avoid fragmentation.

A SOCKS-aware UDP interface MUST report available buffer space smaller than the real space: by 10 octets plus method overhead for IPv4, 262 for domain names and 20 for IPv6.

For quick postcards, you hand them to a special mailbox the doorman names. He forwards them and brings back replies, but he only accepts mail from the person he expects.

§6Security Considerations

The security of firewall traversal with SOCKS depends heavily on the authentication and encapsulation methods an implementation offers and those chosen during negotiation. The RFC adds only that administrators should consider the choice of authentication methods carefully.

How safe the gate is depends on how good the ID check is, so the people running it should pick the check carefully.

§7References

[1]Koblas, D., "SOCKS", Proceedings: 1992 Usenix Security Symposium.