Joke MIME Types: Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents
An April 1st parody of serious MIME type proposals.
Rogers, C., "Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents", RFC 1927, DOI 10.17487/RFC1927, April 1996, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1927>.
@misc{rfc1927,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 1927,
howpublished = {RFC 1927},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC1927},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1927},
author = {C. Rogers},
title = {{Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents}},
pagetotal = 3,
year = 1996,
month = apr,
} RFC text
Contents
Network Working Group C. Rogers
Request for Comments: 1927 ISI
Category: Informational 1 April 1996
Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
1) New MIME Types: Staple and "Paper" Clip
1) indicates the degree of binding of multipart documents:
stapled documents should stay together on the desktop,
while paper clipped ones should be easily spreadable
2) big paper clips vs small ones; heirarchical assembly
3) big vs small for large documents vs. small ones?
4) warning! the presence of electronic staples or paper clips
may break some programs, particularly those designed to do
high-speed copying!
2) patents on the electronic staple and paper clip
1) use First Virtual to record a charge each time new staples
or paper clips are made.
2) to reduce transmission charges, electronic staples should be
bought in boxes of 5000. Reference: Apple's "bento"
technology?
3) electonic staples should have a standard "size and shape"
so a supply of staples could be used be used by several
programs.
3) recycling electronic staples and paper clips
1) to assure proper accounting, and to detect patent violations
(people making their own electronic staples), it may be
necessary to attach a certificate to each staple or paper
clip.
2) When a file or folder is deleted, a "recycler" program could
look inside for staples or paper clips that could be reused
or recycled.
1) staples could be reycled for a small credit
2) paper clips could be reused.
4) custom-look electronic staples and paper clips
1) when stabled or clipped documents are displayed on the
desktop, there should be some icon or visual indicator to
show the presence of the (possibly removable) staple
or paper clip
2) "color=" and "shape=" attributes in the MIME line should
allow senders to customize the appearance of individual
staples or paper clips.
1) this could have some significance for office filing
systems, for instance: a silver paper clip could
trigger one workflow component, while
a gold paper clip could trigger another.
3) "src=" would allow the specification of a URL of the image to
be shown, for even greater control of appearance.
4) it should be possible to specify 3D modelling of your custom
paper clip, for electronic desktops being viewed through
virtual reality headsets
5) electronic paper clip sculpture
1) instead of discarding or reusing paper clips, it should be
possible to "bend" them and display the resulting sculpture
on the desktop
1) a morphing interface would be suitable
2) linked chains of paper clips
3) each paper clip should keep track of how many times it has
been bent. Above a certain limit, the clip should fail.
6) electronic paper clips as page flags
1) in addition to using electronic paper clips to group related
documents, it should be possible to attach an electronic
paper clip to a single page of a multipage document or
collection of documents. This highlights or draws
attention to the page.
2) it should be possible to include positioning information
with the electronic paper clip, to mark specific paragraphs
or sentences
3) combinations of color, shape, size, position, orientation,
etc. could have special meaning
7) additional safety hazards of electronic paper clips
1) they should not be used on data flines which might end up in
the hands of very small children
1) thus, one should consider keeping them in a locked
drawer of the electonic desk on home PCs
2) they should not be attached to documents on floppy disks, as
they may erase portions of the floppy
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
Craig Milo Rogers
USC/Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: 310-822-1511
EMail: rogers@isi.edu
AI ELI5
On this page
§1The April Fools Joke
RFC 1927 is an April 1st joke document that parodies serious Internet standards proposals. It proposes new MIME types called electronic staples and electronic paper clips to bind groups of related documents in digital form, much like physical office supplies bind paper documents.
The author adopts the formal tone of a real RFC while describing increasingly absurd and impractical features, making fun of the tendency to over-engineer solutions to simple problems.
This RFC pretends to propose electronic staples and paper clips to hold digital documents together. It is a joke from April Fools Day.
§2Fictional Features
The proposal describes two MIME types: staples for permanent binding and paper clips for loose association. It then proposes increasingly elaborate features, including different sizes for hierarchical assembly, colored and shaped clips with customizable appearance via attributes like color=, shape= and src= for custom images.
The joke extends to suggesting that documents with electronic staples might be incompatible with high-speed copying programs, and proposing 3D modelling support for virtual reality headsets viewing customized paper clips.
The joke suggests fancy electronic staples and paper clips with colors, shapes, and even 3D models that could look different on your screen.
§3The Satire
The document pokes fun at the complexity and patent concerns of Internet technology by proposing a billing system (via First Virtual) for using electronic staples, bulk purchasing schemes for staple boxes of 5000, and certificates to prevent counterfeiting of staples.
Later sections humorously address safety hazards, such as preventing electronic paper clips from being used on data destined for young children or from being attached to floppy disks where they might cause damage—issues that do not apply to digital objects.
The joke makes fun of how Internet standards sometimes add unnecessary complexity, cost, and complications to simple ideas.