RFC 660 UNKNOWN ARPANET · INTERFACES

Some changes to the IMP and the IMP/Host interface

Four planned changes to the ARPANET IMP software and the IMP/Host interface, announced by BBN in October 1974.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
October 1974
AUTHORS
D.C. Walden
STREAM
Legacy
OLD MESSAGE WINDOW
4 messages
NEW MESSAGE WINDOW
8 messages
ACCESS CHECK INTERVAL
After two minutes of no communication
SPECIAL MESSAGE TYPE
3
DENIED-ACCESS SUB-CODE
3
DOI
10.17487/RFC0660

RFC text

Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                       D. Walden (BBN-NET)
Request for Comments: 660                                              Oct 1974
NIC #31202


       SOME CHANGES TO THE IMP AND THE IMP/HOST INTERFACE

In the next few weeks several changes will be made to the IMP
software including changes to the IMP/Host software interface
as specified in BBN Report No. 1822, Specifications for the
Interconnection of a Host and an IMP. These changes come in
four areas: a) decoupling of the message number sequences of
Hosts; b) Host/Host access control; c) expansion of the
message number window from four to eight; and d) provision for
messages outside the normal message number mechanism. All changes
are backward compatible with possible minor exceptions in timing.

a. Decoupling of the Host/Host message number sequences:
   Since 1972 the IMP system has provided for exactly four
   messages to be outstanding at a time between any pair of
   IMPs, and thus, a total of only four messages between
   all the possible pairs of Hosts on the two IMPs. Because
   all the pairs of Hosts on the two IMPs have had to share
   the four outstanding messages, it has been quite possible
   for the various Hosts to interfere with each other. To
   remove this possibility of interference, the IMP's
   message number logic will soon be changed to allow a
   separate message number sequence between each pair of Hosts.

   To keep manageable the space required to maintain the
   Host/Host message sequences above that presently are required
   for the IMP/IMP message sequences, the Host/Host sequences
   will be taken dynamically from a limited pool of possible
   sequences. The pool will be sufficiently large to seldom
   interfere with a pair of Hosts wishing to communicate. In
   no case will Hosts be prevented from communicating. In
   the event that the Hosts on an IMP desire to simultaneously
   communicate with so many other Hosts that the pool would
   be exhausted, the space in the pool is quickly multiplexed
   in time among all the desired Host/Host conversations
   so that none is stopped although all are possibly slowed.

b. Host/Host access control:
   Upon instructions from ARPA, we will soon add a Host/Host
   access control mechanism to the IMPs. Any pair of Hosts
   wishing to communicate is checked (via bits in the IMP)
   to verify that they have administrative permission to
   communicate. This check normally is made whenever a pair
   of Hosts attempts to communicate after not having
   communicated for two minutes. If the pair of Hosts is
   not allowed to communicate, a special type of Destination
   Dead Message (sub-code 3) is returned to the source
   Host. The default case initially will be to allow all
   Hosts to communicate with each other.



                              -1-

c. Message number window.:
   Once the message number sequences are on a Host/Host
   rather than IMP/IMP basis, the number of messages that
   will be permitted to be outstanding at a time between
   a pair of Hosts will be expanded from four to eight,
   permitting increased Host/Host throughput in some cases.

d. Message outside the normal mechanism:.
   For certain limited experiments which are being carried on
   using the network, it is thought to be desirable
   for specified Hosts to be able to communicate outside the
   normal ordered, error controlled message sequences.
   Thus, the following expansion to the IMP/Host protocol is being
   provided.

i. a single packet message coming from the source Host
   to the source IMP with a (new) special message type,
   3, will be put directly into the IMP store-and-forward
   logic with a mark saying the packet is this special
   kind of message. A multi-packet message of type 3
   will be discarded.

ii. such messages (packets) are routed normally to the
   destination IMP, possibly arriving out of order.

iii. at the destination IMP, messages of the special
   type will be put directly on the destination Host
   output queue skipping the reassembly logic and marked
   with a special (new) IMP to Host message type, also 3.

iv. there is no source-to-destination retransmission
   logic, no reassembly, no RFNMs, no incomplete
   transmissions, etc.

v. if at any time there are insufficient resources in the
   network to handle one of these special messages
   (e.g., the destination Host won't take it), the
   message will be discarded.

vi. by using the special message type between the Host
   and the IMP, the normal message number mechanism is
   preserved for all the Host/Host transmissions which
   presently depend on it.

Because the uncontrolled use of this mechanism will degrade the
performance of the network for all users, the set of Hosts permitted
to use this mechanism will be regulated by the Network Control
Center.

Please file this note with your copy of BBN Report 1822 until
that document is updated.



                              -2-

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMAll pairs of hosts on two IMPs shared just four outstanding messages, so hosts could interfere with each other, and there was no host-to-host access control or way to send messages outside the normal message-number mechanism.
MECHANISMThe IMP software gets separate message number sequences per pair of hosts drawn from a pool, an access check, a window of eight instead of four, and a new single-packet message type 3 that bypasses the ordered, error-controlled path.
WHY IT MATTERSBBN states all changes are backward compatible with possible minor exceptions in timing. Users were asked to file the note with BBN Report 1822 until that document is updated.

§1Announcing Four Changes

RFC 660 announces that in the next few weeks several changes will be made to the IMP software, including changes to the IMP/Host software interface specified in BBN Report No. 1822. They come in four areas: decoupling of host message number sequences, host-to-host access control, expansion of the message number window from four to eight, and messages outside the normal message number mechanism.

All changes are said to be backward compatible with possible minor exceptions in timing.

BBN, the group that built the network boxes, is telling everyone about four upgrades that are coming soon.

§2Separate Message Numbers and a Wider Window

Since 1972 the IMP system has allowed exactly four messages outstanding between any pair of IMPs, shared by every pair of hosts on those two IMPs, so hosts could interfere with each other. The IMP's message number logic will change to give a separate sequence between each pair of hosts.

To keep storage manageable, the host-to-host sequences come dynamically from a limited pool, sized so it seldom interferes. No hosts are prevented from communicating: if the pool would be exhausted, it is multiplexed in time among the conversations, so all may be slowed but none stopped.

Once sequences are per pair of hosts, the number of messages allowed outstanding between a pair grows from four to eight, permitting increased throughput in some cases.

Before, everyone at one post office shared four mail slots, so they got in each other's way. Now each pair of friends gets its own slots, and eight at a time.

BEFORE AND AFTER THE MESSAGE NUMBER CHANGE (RFC 660)
AspectUntil nowPlanned
Message sequencesOne set shared per pair of IMPsSeparate set per pair of hosts
Outstanding messages THIS RFCFourEight

§3Host-to-Host Access Control

Upon instructions from ARPA, the IMPs get a mechanism that checks, using bits in the IMP, that a pair of hosts has administrative permission to communicate. The check is normally made whenever a pair attempts to communicate after not having communicated for two minutes.

If the pair is not allowed to communicate, a special type of Destination Dead Message (sub-code 3) is returned to the source host. Initially the default is to allow all hosts to communicate with each other.

The network can now keep a list of who is allowed to talk to whom. If you are not on it, you get a polite "no" message back.

§4Messages Outside the Normal Mechanism

For limited experiments, specified hosts may communicate outside the normal ordered, error-controlled sequences. A single-packet message from a host to its IMP with a new message type, 3, goes directly into the store-and-forward logic marked as special. A multi-packet message of type 3 is discarded.

These packets are routed normally, possibly arriving out of order, and at the destination IMP are put directly on the host output queue, skipping reassembly, marked with a new IMP-to-host message type, also 3. There is no retransmission, reassembly, RFNMs or incomplete transmissions, and a message is discarded if network resources are insufficient. The normal mechanism stays intact for everything else.

Because uncontrolled use would degrade the network for all users, the set of hosts allowed to use this mechanism is regulated by the Network Control Center.

This is like a fast lane for notes with no receipt and no promise they arrive in order. Only a few approved computers may use it, because too many notes would clog the roads.

§5References

[BBN 1822]BBN Report No. 1822, "Specifications for the Interconnection of a Host and an IMP".