RFC 6207 INFORMATIONAL DATA FORMATS · METADATA · XML

MODS/METS media types: The Media Types application/mods+xml, application/mads+xml, application/mets+xml, application/marcxml+xml, and application/sru+xml

Register official names for library metadata XML formats.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
April 2011
AUTHORS
R. Denenberg
STREAM
IETF
MEDIA TYPES REGISTERED
5 (MODS, MADS, METS, MARCXML, SRU)
BASE TYPE
application/*, with +xml suffix
PARAMETER SUPPORT
charset (optional, as in application/xml)
FILE EXTENSIONS
.mods, .mads, .mets, .marcxml, .sru
INTENDED USAGE
COMMON
DOI
10.17487/RFC6207

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                 R. Denenberg, Ed.
Request for Comments: 6207                           Library of Congress
Category: Informational                                       April 2011
ISSN: 2070-1721


      The Media Types application/mods+xml, application/mads+xml,
 application/mets+xml, application/marcxml+xml, and application/sru+xml

Abstract

   This document specifies media types for the following formats: MODS
   (Metadata Object Description Schema), MADS (Metadata Authority
   Description Schema), METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission
   Standard), MARCXML (MARC21 XML Schema), and the SRU (Search/Retrieve
   via URL Response Format) protocol response XML schema.  These are all
   XML schemas providing representations of various forms of information
   including metadata and search results.

Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for informational purposes.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
   Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6207.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Registration for mods+xml  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Registration for mads+xml  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   4.  Registration for mets+xml  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   5.  Registration for marcxml+xml . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   6.  Registration for sru+xml . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   7.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   8.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     8.1.  Harmful Content  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     8.2.  Authenticity and Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   9.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     9.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     9.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

1.  Introduction

   The Library of Congress, on behalf of and in collaboration with
   various components of the metadata and information retrieval
   community, has issued specifications that define formats for
   representation of various forms of information including metadata and
   search results.  This memo provides information about the media types
   associated with several of these formats, all of which are XML
   schemas.

   MODS: Metadata Object Description Schema.  An XML schema for a
      bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of
      purposes, and particularly for library applications.

   MADS: Metadata Authority Description Schema.  An XML schema for an
      authority element set used to provide metadata about agents
      (people, organizations), events, and terms (topics, geographics,
      genres, etc.).  It is a companion to MODS.

   METS: Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard.  An XML schema for
      encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata
      regarding objects within a digital library.

   MARCXML: MARC21 XML Schema.  An XML schema for the direct XML
      representation of the MARC format (for which there already exists
      a media type, application/marc; see [RFC2220]).  By "direct XML
      representation", we mean that it encodes the actual MARC data
      within XML.  (This is in contrast to MODS: MARC uses codes for its
      element names; MODS represents the same information but uses
      semantically meaningful names while MARCXML uses the MARC codes.)

   SRU: Search/Retrieve via URL Response Format.  An XML schema for the
      SRU response.  SRU is a protocol, and the media type sru+xml
      pertains specifically to the default SRU response.  The SRU
      response may be supplied in any of a number of suitable schemas,
      RSS, ATOM, for example, and the client identifies the desired
      format in the request, hence the need for a media type.  This
      mechanism will be introduced in SRU 2.0; in previous versions
      (that is, all versions to date; 2.0 is in development), all
      responses are supplied in the existing default format, so no media
      type was necessary.  SRU 2.0 is being developed within the
      Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information
      Standards (OASIS).

2.  Registration for mods+xml

   MIME media type name: application

   MIME subtype name: mods+xml

   Required parameters: None

   Optional parameters: (charset)  This parameter has semantics
      identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
      type as specified in [RFC3023].

   Encoding considerations:  Identical to those of "application/xml" as
      described in [RFC3023].

   Security considerations:  See Section 8 of RFC 6207.

   Interoperability considerations:  There are no known interoperability
      issues.

   Published specification:  [MODS-SCHEMA], [MODS].

   Applications which use this media type:  Various MODS-conformant
      toolkits use this media type.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s): None

   File extension(s): .mods

   Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person and email address to contact for further information:
      Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: None

   Author/Change controller:  The MODS specification was developed by
      the Library of Congress and is maintained by the Library of
      Congress in conjunction with the MODS Editorial Committee, which
      has change control over the specification.

3.  Registration for mads+xml

   MIME media type name: application

   MIME subtype name: mads+xml

   Required parameters: None

   Optional parameters: (charset)  This parameter has semantics
      identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
      type as specified in [RFC3023].

   Encoding considerations:  Identical to those of "application/xml" as
      described in [RFC3023].

   Security considerations:  See Section 8 of RFC 6207.

   Interoperability considerations:  There are no known interoperability
      issues.

   Published specification:  [MADS-SCHEMA], [MADS].

   Applications which use this media type:  Various MADS conformant
      toolkits use this media type.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s): None

   File extension(s): .mads

   Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person and email address to contact for further information:
      Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: None

   Author/Change controller:  The MADS specification was developed by
      the Library of Congress and is maintained by the Library of
      Congress in conjunction with the MODS Editorial Committee, which
      has change control over the specification.

4.  Registration for mets+xml

   MIME media type name: application

   MIME subtype name: mets+xml

   Required parameters: None

   Optional parameters: (charset)  This parameter has semantics
      identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
      type as specified in [RFC3023].

   Encoding considerations:  Identical to those of "application/xml" as
      described in [RFC3023].

   Security considerations:  See Section 8 of RFC 6207.

   Interoperability considerations:  There are no known interoperability
      issues.

   Published specification:  [METS-SCHEMA], [METS].

   Applications which use this media type:  Various METS conformant
      toolkits use this media type.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s): None

   File extension(s): .mets

   Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person and email address to contact for further information:
      Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: None

   Author/Change controller:  The METS specification was developed by
      the Library of Congress and is maintained by the Library of
      Congress in conjunction with the METS Editorial Board as an
      initiative of the Digital Library Federation.

5.  Registration for marcxml+xml

   MIME media type name: application

   MIME subtype name: marcxml+xml

   Required parameters: None

   Optional parameters: (charset)  This parameter has semantics
      identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
      type as specified in [RFC3023].

   Encoding considerations:  Identical to those of "application/xml" as
      described in [RFC3023].

   Security considerations:  See Section 8 of RFC 6207.

   Interoperability considerations:  There are no known interoperability
      issues.

   Published specification:  [MARCXML-SCHEMA], [MARCXML].

   Applications which use this media type:  Various MARCXML conformant
      toolkits use this media type.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s): None

   File extension(s): .mrcx

   Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person and email address to contact for further information:
      Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: None

   Author/Change controller:  The MARCXML standard is driven by the MARC
      standards, maintained at the Library of Congress.

6.  Registration for sru+xml

   MIME media type name: application

   MIME subtype name: sru+xml

   Required parameters: None

   Optional parameters: (charset)  This parameter has semantics
      identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media
      type as specified in [RFC3023].

   Encoding considerations:  Identical to those of "application/xml" as
      described in [RFC3023].

   Security considerations:  See Section 8 of RFC 6207.

   Interoperability considerations:  There are no known interoperability
      issues.

   Published specification:  [SRU-SCHEMA], [SRU].

   Applications which use this media type:  Various SRU conformant
      toolkits use this media type.

   Additional information:

   Magic number(s): None

   File extension(s): .sru

   Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT

   Person and email address to contact for further information:
      Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Restrictions on usage: None

   Author/Change controller:  The SRU specification for versions earlier
      than 2.0 is maintained at the Library of Congress, in conjunction
      with the SRU Editorial Board.  Version 2.0 (for which the sru+xml
      media type pertains) is being developed within OASIS.

7.  IANA Considerations

   IANA has registered the five media types described in Sections 2, 3,
   4, 5, and 6 in the MIME media type registry (in the Standards Tree).

8.  Security Considerations

   An XML resource does not in itself compromise data security.
   Applications that retrieve XML files over a network by means of
   dereferencing a Uniform Resource Identifier [RFC3986] are advised to
   properly interpret the data so as to prevent unintended access.
   Hence, the security issues described in Section 7 of [RFC3986] apply.

   Because the media types described in this document use the "+xml"
   convention, they share the security considerations described in
   Section 10 of [RFC3023].

   In general, security issues related to the use of XML in IETF
   protocols are discussed in Section 7 of [RFC3470] also apply.  In the
   following sections, we review some aspects that are important for
   document-centric XML as applied to text encoding.

8.1.  Harmful Content

   Any application that retrieves the XML media types described in this
   specification needs to be aware of risks connected with injection of
   harmful scripts and executable XML (i.e., "active content" as
   described in [RFC4288]).  Although XML inclusion mechanisms and the
   use of external entities can introduce vulnerabilities to various
   forms of spoofing and also reveal aspects of a service in a way that
   may compromise its security, such vulnerabilities are application
   specific.  In any case, MODS documents do not contain "active
   content".

8.2.  Authenticity and Confidentiality

   Historical and bibliographical information can often be encoded in
   MODS documents, and such information might even have legal force in
   some jurisdictions.  Digitization and encoding of such information
   might require technologies for assuring authenticity, such as
   cryptographic check sums and electronic signatures.  Similarly,
   historical documents might in part or in their entirety be
   confidential.  Such confidentiality might be required by law or by
   the terms and conditions such as in the case of donated or deposited
   text from private sources.  A text archive might need content
   filtering or cryptographic technologies to meet such requirements.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [RFC3023]         Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML
                     Media Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.

   [RFC3470]         Hollenbeck, S., Rose, M., and L. Masinter,
                     "Guidelines for the Use of Extensible Markup
                     Language (XML) within IETF Protocols", BCP 70,
                     RFC 3470, January 2003.

   [RFC3986]         Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter,
                     "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic
                     Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005.

   [MADS-SCHEMA]     Denenberg, R., "MADS Schema",
                     <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/mads.xsd>.

   [MADS]            Denenberg, R., "Metadata Authority Description
                     Schema", <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/>.

   [MARCXML-SCHEMA]  Trail, N., "MARCXML Schema", <http://www.loc.gov/
                     standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd>.

   [MARCXML]         Trail, N., "MARCXML MARC21 XML Schema",
                     <http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/>.

   [METS-SCHEMA]     Redding, C., "METS Schema",
                     <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd>.

   [METS]            Redding, C., "Metadata Encoding and Transmission
                     Standard", <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/>.

   [MODS-SCHEMA]     Denenberg, R., "MODS Schema",
                     <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods.xsd>.

   [MODS]            Denenberg, R., "Metadata Object Description
                     Schema", <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/>.

   [SRU-SCHEMA]      Denenberg, R., "SRU Schema", <http://www.loc.gov/
                     standards/sru/oasis/schemas/sruResponse.xsd>.

   [SRU]             Denenberg, R., "Search/Retrieve via URL Response
                     Format", <http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2220]         Guenther, R., "The Application/MARC Content-type",
                     RFC 2220, October 1997.

   [RFC4288]         Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type
                     Specifications and Registration Procedures",
                     BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.

Author's Address

   Ray Denenberg (editor)
   Library of Congress
   101 Independence Ave, SE
   Washington, DC  20540
   USA

   Phone: (202) 707-5795
   EMail: rden@loc.gov

AI ELI5

On this page
PROBLEMLibraries and archives manage data in several XML formats (MODS, MADS, METS, MARCXML, SRU), but these had no registered MIME media types, so systems could not correctly label them when transmitting over HTTP or email.
MECHANISMThis RFC registers five media types with IANA: one each for MODS, MADS, METS, MARCXML, and SRU response format, all as XML subtypes of the application type.
STANDARDS REGISTEREDSystems can now explicitly declare the format of library metadata documents and search results, enabling proper parsing and handling across networks.

§1Library Metadata Standards

The Library of Congress maintains several XML schemas for describing and organizing information: MODS (Metadata Object Description Schema) for bibliographic data, MADS (Metadata Authority Description Schema) for authority records about people, organizations, and subjects, METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard) for descriptive and structural metadata, MARCXML (the XML representation of MARC21 cataloging records), and SRU (Search/Retrieve via URL) response format. These are widely used by libraries, archives, and digital repositories.

Without registered media types, systems had no standard way to label these documents when sending them over HTTP, email, or other protocols. This RFC registers each one with IANA so that applications can declare and recognize the format unambiguously.

Libraries have different ways to write down what books and records they have. This document says 'here is the official name for each kind of list'.

§2The Five Media Types

The RFC registers five media types, all with charset parameter support (following application/xml as defined in RFC 3023):

application/mods+xml: Describes bibliographic objects with meaningful element names (such as title, author, publisher) rather than the coded abbreviations used in MARC. MODS is commonly used in digital library applications.

application/mads+xml: Records authority data for names, subjects, geographic locations, and genres, typically used alongside MODS for consistent subject indexing.

application/mets+xml: Encodes descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata for digital objects, combining the roles of multiple schemas.

application/marcxml+xml: The direct XML serialization of MARC21 records, preserving the coded fields of the original MARC format but allowing XML processing.

application/sru+xml: The default response format for the SRU search protocol, used in SRU 2.0 and later where clients can request alternative formats.

MODS is like a detailed book catalog. MADS holds information about authors and subjects. METS is a container for all kinds of metadata. MARCXML is the same thing as the old MARC format but written in a modern way. SRU is the format for search results from a library server.

Library metadata XML formats and their uses
  • Library Metadata
    • MODS Bibliographic descriptions with semantic element names
    • MADS Authority records for names and subjects
    • METS Container for descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata
    • MARCXML XML representation of MARC21 cataloging records
    • SRU Response format for search and retrieval

§3Interoperability and Security

Each registration includes encoding considerations (identical to those of application/xml), file extensions (.mods, .mads, .mets, .marcxml, .sru), and contact information for further questions. Applications using these media types include MODS-conformant toolkits, digital library platforms, and authority management systems.

The RFC notes that XML itself carries inherent security risks. XML entities can reference external resources, and parsing untrusted XML can lead to denial-of-service attacks. Implementations MUST carefully validate XML and, where appropriate, disable external entity resolution. The formats themselves do not contain executable code, but recipients should apply the same caution they would to any XML document.

Once a program knows what kind of file it is receiving, it can read it safely, but it should never trust that the file is what it claims to be.

§4Current Status and Use

All five media types are registered with IANA and in use across the library and information retrieval community. MODS and MARCXML are particularly widespread in digital library systems. METS is used by many institutional repositories and digitization projects. MADS is standard for authority control. SRU is used by Z39.50 servers and library search systems, with SRU 2.0 enabling content negotiation that relies on these media types.

The RFC is an Informational standards-track publication from the IETF and remains current as these formats continue to be the primary XML standards for library metadata.

Libraries around the world use these formats to organize and share their catalogs.

§5References

[RFC3023]RFC 3023Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.January 2001[RFC2220]RFC 2220Guenther, R., "The Application/MARC Content-type", RFC 2220, October 1997.October 1997
[MODS-SCHEMA]Library of Congress, "MODS Official Web Site", http://www.loc.gov/mods/
[MADS-SCHEMA]Library of Congress, "MADS Official Web Site", http://www.loc.gov/mads/
[METS]Library of Congress, "METS: Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Official Web Site", http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/