MIX and MIXAL?
A one-paragraph query asking whether any ARPANET host offers an interpreter and assembler for Knuth's MIX computer.
Walden, D.C., "MIX and MIXAL?", RFC 473, DOI 10.17487/RFC0473, February 1973, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc473>.
@misc{rfc473,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 473,
howpublished = {RFC 473},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC0473},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc473},
author = {D.C. Walden},
title = {{MIX and MIXAL?}},
pagetotal = 1,
year = 1973,
month = feb,
} RFC text
Network Working Group D. Walden
Request for Comments: 473 BBN-NET
NIC: 14811 28 February 1973
MIX and MIXAL?
Is there an interpreter for Knuth's hypothetical computer, MIX,
together with an assemble for the MIX assembly language, MIXAL,
available on any ARPA Network Host? If not, will not some Network
Host make them available (cheaply)?--it would be considerable service
to all of us who are students of the "Art of Computer Programming."
[This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry]
[into the online RFC archives by Helene Morin, Via Genie 12/1999]
AI ELI5
On this page
§1The Question
This RFC, from D. Walden of BBN-NET and dated 28 February 1973, is a single question. It asks whether an interpreter for MIX, Knuth's hypothetical computer, is available on any ARPA Network host, together with an assembler for the MIX assembly language, MIXAL.
MIX is a pretend computer from a book. The author asks whether anyone on the network has a program that can act like it.
§2Who Wants It and Why
The author describes the audience as students of the Art of Computer Programming. Having MIX and MIXAL available on a network host would, in the RFC's words, be a considerable service to all of them.
The RFC adds that, if no host has these tools, it hopes some Network Host will make them available cheaply.
People reading the book want to try its examples on a real machine, and a pretend computer needs a helper program to run on a real one.
§3What the RFC Settles
The RFC defines no protocol and no format, and it gives no answer to its own question. It is an early example of the RFC series being used to ask the community for a resource rather than to specify a standard.
It is a note on a bulletin board that says, does anyone have this? The note does not say who answered.