Resource notebook framework
A 1973 plan to make the Network Information Center the single coordinator of surveys about network resources.
Kudlick, M.D., "Resource notebook framework", RFC 464, DOI 10.17487/RFC0464, February 1973, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc464>.
@misc{rfc464,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 464,
howpublished = {RFC 464},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC0464},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc464},
author = {M.D. Kudlick},
title = {{Resource notebook framework}},
pagetotal = 2,
year = 1973,
month = feb,
} RFC text
Contents
Network Working Group Michael D. Kudlick
RFC # 464 SRI-ARC
NIC # 14738 February 27, 1973
Resource Notebook Framework
Introduction
The purpose of this RFC is to present a framework for coordinating all
the surveys and data gathering efforts concerned with "resource
notebook" type of information.
We have obtained agreement from ARPA with the framework, which is
described below.
The scheme is designed with two purposes:
a) to avoid a proliferation of data gathering efforts, which
would overwhelm the sites and persons supplying the much-needed
information;
b) to give the responsibility to the NIC for coordinating the
tasks associated with the resource notebook.
Two companion documents, NIC 14514 and NIC 14515 provide supplementary
information to this RFC.
NIC 14514 describes the history of the Resource Notebook from 1971
to the present.
NIC 14515 contains the questionnaire that the NIC is currently
sending to server sites for data on Network Resources.
A recent RFC by John Iseli and Dave Crocker (NWG/RFC #462, NIC 14434)
also addresses the same problem area.
The proposed framework for data collection suggested by John and
Dave is different from the framework outlined in this RFC.
Framework
The Network Information Center will coordinate the task of collecting,
verifying, and disseminating information of a "resource notebook"
nature.
a) Collecting and verifying the data.
Because of the magnitude of this task, regional data collectors
would provide assistance both to the NIC and to the sites
supplying the information.
We think that initially there should be five regions:
Boston, Washington DC, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Mid-
Continent.
The regional agent would collect the information from the sites
in their region and forward it to NIC for inclusion in the
Resource Notebook data base.
The NIC would work closely with the regional agents to ensure
that the data is accurate and up-to-date.
b) Disseminating data.
There is presently a need to prepare different subsets or
"views" of the resource notebook information.
Regardless of which groups on the Network are given
responsibility for preparing different views of the complete
resource notebook data base, these views should be available for
use on-line as the NIC as well as off-line.
A working group of persons interested in the needs and problems of a
resource notebook would meet periodically to review the situation, and
to make concrete proposals for improvements.
Discussion
We welcome discussion on this RFC.
I you think it is desirable, a meeting could be held at SRI-ARC to
discuss the whole problem area.
If a meeting is desirable, we suggest it be held soon, say on Monday
March 19, 1973, at 8:30 AM in the SRI-ARC Conference Room.
Please let us have your comments by March 9.
You may contact us at (415) 326-6200, ext 3617, care of Mlke
Kudlick.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 9/99 ]
AI ELI5
On this page
§1The Problem and the Two Goals
The RFC presents a framework for coordinating all the surveys and data-gathering efforts concerned with resource notebook information. The author says agreement from ARPA had already been obtained.
The scheme has two purposes: to avoid a proliferation of data-gathering efforts that would overwhelm the sites and people supplying the information, and to give the NIC responsibility for coordinating the tasks of the resource notebook. Two companion documents, NIC 14514 (the history of the notebook from 1971) and NIC 14515 (the questionnaire the NIC was sending to server sites), give more detail.
If everyone asks the same people the same questions, those people get tired. So one office will ask once.
§2The Framework
The NIC would coordinate collecting, verifying and disseminating the data. Because of the size of the task, regional data collectors would help both the NIC and the supplying sites. Initially there would be five regions: Boston, Washington DC, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Mid-Continent.
Each regional agent would gather information from sites in the region and forward it to the NIC for the Resource Notebook data base, with the NIC working closely with them to keep the data accurate and up to date.
For dissemination, different subsets or "views" of the information were needed. Whoever prepared them, the views should be available on-line at the NIC as well as off-line. A working group would meet periodically to review the situation and make concrete proposals.
Helpers in five parts of the country collect the answers and send them to the main office, which keeps one big, tidy list that others can look at.
§3Discussion and Related Work
The RFC invites discussion and offers a meeting at SRI-ARC, suggested for Monday March 19, 1973, at 8:30 AM, with comments requested by March 9.
It also notes that a recent RFC by John Iseli and Dave Crocker (RFC 462) addresses the same problem area but proposes a different framework for data collection.
The author asks for opinions and mentions that two other people had a different plan for the same job.